Labs · Review2026 Edition

Supabase Review 2026

Is Supabase worth it? Yes, if you are building a web or mobile app and want a real Postgres database, user auth, file storage and realtime without running a server. Free covers a prototype, and Pro starts at $25 a month per organization. It is a weaker fit if nobody on your team writes code, if you are heading past a few hundred thousand monthly active users, or if you spin up project after project: every project adds its own compute to the bill, and a quiet free project gets paused after 7 days.

We compared Supabase with Firebase, Convex, Neon, Appwrite, Nhost and PocketBase on five criteria, went through its pricing page, billing docs and changelog, and read dozens of user reports. Here is what most reviews skip: four bill examples worked out from the official rate card, what the spend cap does not stop, which EU regions to pick for GDPR, and the security checks to run before you ship an AI-generated app. If you would rather have someone set it up, our Supabase agency builds it with you, and our Supabase training teaches your team to run it.

Verdict · 5 criteria scored

Our Supabase review in a nutshell

Romain Cochard
Reviewed by
Romain Cochard
CEO of Hack'celeration

Supabase gives you the whole backend of an app: a full Postgres database, an API generated automatically from your tables, user auth, file storage, realtime and on-demand functions. The code is open source under the Apache 2.0 license, and the repo sits at nearly 115,000 GitHub stars. In 2026, Supabase raised $500 million at a $10.5 billion valuation, so the vendor is not going anywhere soon.

The catch comes in three parts. You pay per organization, but compute (the machine running your database) is billed per project, so a staging environment doubles part of the bill. Security depends on Row Level Security (RLS) policies you write yourself, and a 2025 scan of 1,645 apps built with Lovable found 170 whose data could be read without logging in, because those policies were missing or too loose. And consumer reviews describe slow support and surprise invoices.

Our verdict: 4.3/5. Pick Supabase for an app that needs a real relational database, user auth and an API without writing a server. Look at Firebase for a mobile app deep in the Google ecosystem, Neon if you only want a Postgres database that scales to zero, and Convex if your team writes everything in TypeScript.

Free trial

The numbers speak. Want to try Supabase?

Try Supabase for free→
Supabase plans

What Supabase costs, plan by plan

Supabase sells one subscription per organization, then bills usage above the quotas. The trap sits in one line of the billing docs: compute is billed per project. Pro includes $10 of compute credit a month, enough for one Micro instance. Every extra project adds its own instance. The last two cards show what two real apps pay, worked out from the official rate card.

Monthly prices in US dollars, before tax

Free

For a prototype or side project

$0/month

2 active projects max

  • 50,000 monthly active users
  • 500 MB database per project, 2 GB disk
  • 1 GB file storage, 5 GB egress
  • 500,000 Edge Function invocations a month
  • Paused after 7 days of inactivity
  • No backups, 1 day of logs
Best starting point

Pro

For an app in production

$25/month per organization

Includes $10 compute credit (one Micro instance)

  • 100,000 MAU, then $0.00325 each
  • 8 GB disk per project, then $0.125/GB
  • 100 GB file storage, 250 GB egress
  • 2 million function invocations, then $2 per million
  • Daily backups kept 7 days
  • Never paused, spend cap on by default

Team

For companies with compliance needs

$599/month

Pro quotas plus compliance

  • SOC 2 and ISO 27001 reports
  • HIPAA as a paid add-on with a BAA
  • Backups kept 14 days
  • Logs kept 28 days
  • No spend cap: every overage is billed

Enterprise

For large accounts

Custom

Negotiated contract

  • Logs kept 90 days
  • Custom backup retention
  • Dedicated assistance

Example: production app with staging

2 Micro projects, 30,000 MAU, 3 GB database

$35/month on Pro

The $10 credit only covers one project

  • Pro subscription: $25
  • Production project on Micro: covered by the credit
  • Staging project on Micro: $10
  • Users, disk and egress within quota: $0

Example: an app that takes off

1 Small project, 150,000 MAU

$192.50/month on Pro

Without point-in-time recovery

  • Pro subscription: $25
  • Small instance at $15 minus $10 credit: $5
  • 50,000 users over quota: $162.50
  • 7-day point-in-time recovery: about $100 more

Prices before tax, read in 2026 on the official Supabase pricing page and billing docs. Monthly compute: Micro $10, Small $15, Medium $60, Large $110, XL $210, 2XL $410, 4XL $960, up to $3,730 for 16XL, the largest listed size. The Pro $10 credit covers one Micro instance, not one per project.

Community · user reviews

What developers actually say about Supabase

The Hack'celeration verdict

We compared Supabase on five criteria.

One score per criterion, against Firebase, Convex and Neon, with the wins and the catches.

Criterion 01 · Ease of use

Is Supabase easy to get started with?

4.3/5

Getting started, yes. You sign up, pick a region, and within minutes you have a Postgres database, an API URL and access keys. The table editor feels like a spreadsheet: add columns, type rows, and the API updates itself.

The hard part comes when you lock things down. Supabase exposes your database straight to the browser, and Row Level Security (RLS) policies decide who can read and write what. You write those policies in SQL. For a developer, it is elegant: policies replace much of the API layer you would otherwise write. For a non-developer, it is a wall. A French user writing after 14 months on the product describes a steep learning curve and complex RLS, and we agree.

One more friction point: the CLI, which you need for local development, had a long reputation for being flaky. Supabase improved this in 2025: Edge Functions now deploy without Docker.

Against the competition, Firebase is just as quick to launch but thinks in documents, not tables. Xano or Bubble are friendlier without code, but you give up Postgres. Supabase is the best middle ground for anyone who knows a little SQL.

Verdict

Very easy for a developer, demanding for a beginner. Budget half a day to understand RLS before you put an app live.

Criterion 02 · Value for money

What does Supabase really cost in production?

3.9/5

For a small app, $25 to $35 a month. For an app that grows, a lot more, and not always where you expect. Pro costs $25 a month per organization and includes $10 of compute credit, which covers one Micro instance. Every extra project adds its own instance: a production project and a staging project on Micro come to $35. Three environments (dev, staging, prod) come to $45.

The second line item is auth. Pro includes 100,000 monthly active users, then charges $0.00325 per user. At 150,000 MAU, that adds $162.50. At 500,000 MAU, auth alone runs $1,300 a month (400,000 users over quota). That is the most common reason people move off Supabase: they keep the database and hand auth to a specialist service.

The third line item hides in the add-ons. Point-in-time recovery costs about $100 a month for 7 days, $200 for 14 days and $400 for 28 days. Disk above 8 GB is $0.125 per GB, uncached egress above 250 GB is $0.09 per GB. Say your database grows to 20 GB: that is $1.50 more. Push 400 GB of uncached egress and you add $13.50. Both stay reasonable.

Then there is the spend cap, on by default on Pro. It blocks overages on disk, egress, MAU, Edge Functions, realtime and storage: past the quota, your service gets restricted instead of billed. It does not stop compute, point-in-time recovery, custom domains or IPv4 add-ons. A teammate who bumps the instance size or turns on PITR raises the bill, cap or no cap. For the full field, see our Supabase alternatives page.

Verdict

Good value for one or two mid-size apps. Run the math per project and per active user before you scale, and lock down the Owner role.

Criterion 03 · Features and depth

What can Supabase do beyond the database?

4.8/5

Almost everything an app needs on the backend. The database is full Postgres, not a lookalike: you keep joins, views, SQL functions, triggers and dozens of extensions. The API is generated from your tables. On top, Supabase adds user auth, file storage with image transformations, realtime and on-demand Edge Functions running on Deno.

On AI, Supabase is well ahead. The pgvector extension turns your database into a vector search engine, which is enough for an assistant that answers from your documents. An official MCP server lets an assistant like Claude read your schema and run queries. To weigh it against a dedicated vector database, read our Pinecone vs Supabase comparison.

The 2026 changelog points the same way: passkeys for auth in beta, binary realtime Broadcast, a MongoDB wrapper, automatic retries in the client libraries, and end of support for Postgres 14. A public knowledge base now collects fixes for common errors too.

The limit is self-hosting. The code is open and you can run Supabase on your own server, but not with every feature: no point-in-time recovery, a reduced Studio and missing logs. One GitHub user complains of bugs and missing tutorials. If self-hosting is your main criterion, PocketBase or Appwrite are simpler to install.

Verdict

The most complete backend on Postgres you can buy, especially for an AI project. Self-hosting is for technical teams only.

Free trial

Sold on the details? Start a Supabase trial.

Try Supabase for free→
Criterion 04 · Customer support and assistance

Can you count on Supabase support?

3.7/5

For a technical question, yes, thanks to the docs. For a billing problem or a lost database, it is less certain. Supabase's documentation is among the best in the category: every feature has its guide, and the public knowledge base covers the common errors, from slow RLS policies to paused projects.

Human support depends on your plan, and this is where reviews split. On a consumer review site, Supabase drops to 2.3/5 across 76 reviews, more than half of them one star: surprise invoices, double charges, outages and tickets that went days without a useful answer. Those reviews are not verified by the site, but the pattern is clear: people like the product and get frustrated when something breaks.

The biggest risk sits on the free plan, which has no backups. A GitHub discussion describes an empty table after restoring a paused project, with no confirmed cause. The good news: a paused project can now be restored for up to a year (it used to be 90 days), and Supabase emails you about a week before pausing.

If you want a real safety net, Pro adds daily backups kept 7 days, and Team goes to 14 days with logs kept 28 days. To get hands-on help on your own project, our Supabase training starts from your real use case.

Verdict

Excellent docs, but support is described as slow when things go wrong. Keep your own backups, especially on Free.

Criterion 05 · Available integrations

Does Supabase plug into the rest of your stack?

4.8/5

Yes, and that is one of its biggest strengths. Supabase speaks standard Postgres, so any tool that reads Postgres reads Supabase.

Supabase has become the default backend for AI app builders. Lovable creates its tables and policies straight in Supabase, and WeWeb uses it as the database behind no-code frontends. Handy, and also where the biggest security risk lives: a vulnerability logged in 2025 (CVE-2025-48757) hit 170 out of 1,645 generated apps scanned, whose tables could be read without logging in because RLS was missing or too loose. A service_role key exposed in frontend code also gives full access to your database.

To automate around your data (create a row when a form comes in, send an email when an order changes status), Supabase plugs into n8n and Make. For an AI agent searching your documents, n8n has a Supabase vector store node. And our Claude and Supabase guide shows how to drive your database from an assistant.

Verdict

Very well connected, for developers, no-code builders and automations alike. Check the RLS of any AI-generated app before it goes live.

Pay less, ship safer

Eight tips to get Supabase right

These settings come from Supabase's docs, its GitHub discussions and developer write-ups. They head off the three most common bad surprises: a slow database, a ballooning bill and exposed data.

01

Wrap auth.uid() in a select inside your RLS policies

Big win

In a policy, a bare auth.uid() gets evaluated for every row. Wrapped as (select auth.uid()), it runs once per query. In Supabase's own benchmark on a 100,000-row table, the query drops from 179 ms to 9 ms.

Index every column a policy filters on (usually user_id), and filter on the client too: the policy protects, the filter speeds things up.

Measured gain
179 ms to 9 ms
Where
RLS policies
02

Audit the RLS of every AI-generated app

Critical

If Lovable, Bolt or another builder created your tables, open each one and confirm RLS is enabled with at least one policy. An app with RLS off lets anyone with your public key read the table.

Never paste the service_role key into frontend code: it bypasses every policy. Keep it server-side, in a function or an automation.

03

Keep a free project awake without betting your data on it

A free project with low activity for 7 days gets paused. A scheduled job (a GitHub Action, for example) that queries the database a few times a day keeps it awake. Two caveats: a job that fails silently will not warn you, and one user reports the pings were not enough.

If the project matters, $25 Pro never pauses. That is the real fix.

04

Keep the spend cap on and lock down the Owner role

The spend cap is on by default on Pro. Leave it there, unless downtime costs you more than an overage. But it does not block compute, PITR or custom domains.

So limit the Owner role to one or two people: that role can bump an instance or turn on a paid add-on.

05

Count your projects before you add staging

Each project has its own compute instance, and the $10 Pro credit covers only one. A staging project costs at least $10 a month, a third environment another $10.

Split client work into separate organizations too: billing stays readable, and one client's usage never eats another's quota.

06

Pick a specific EU region on day one

GDPR

You choose the region when you create the project, so decide it up front. For EU customer data, pick Paris, Frankfurt, Ireland or Stockholm. London and Zurich are in Europe but outside the EU.

Ask for the DPA too, and remember that the region does not settle everything: backups, logs, Edge Function execution and sub-processors also count in your data-transfer analysis.

07

Run your own backups on Free

Free includes no backups at all. A regular export with the standard Postgres tool (pg_dump) is enough for a prototype.

On Pro, daily backups cover 7 days. If you cannot lose a day of data, point-in-time recovery adds about $100 a month.

08

Size the disk before a big import

Disk grows on its own, but auto-expansion is limited to four times per 24 hours. A large import can hit a full disk, which flips the database to read-only.

Bump the disk manually before importing, then load in batches. On Free, the disk is fixed at 2 GB and the database goes read-only once it is 95% full.

09

Test migrations on a branch, then delete it

Cheaper

Instead of keeping a staging project running all month, Pro lets you spin up a branch of your database to test a migration. It bills $0.01344 per hour: about $9.81 if you leave it on for a full month, a few cents if you delete it once you have checked your change.

One more line to watch: a custom domain (api.yoursite.com) is an add-on at $10 per domain, per month, per project. For a prototype, the default Supabase URL is fine.

Branch
$0.01344 per hour
Custom domain
$10 a month per project
Supabase not the right fit?

Six tools worth a look

Supabase is not the right call for everyone. These six are the names that keep coming up in English-language comparisons and developer threads, and each does better on one specific point: mobile apps, TypeScript realtime, a bare database, self-hosting, GraphQL or price. Every card spells out the downside too. The full list lives on our Supabase alternatives page.

01

Firebase: Google's pick for mobile apps

Mobile

Firebase is the long-time rival and still the default comparison in most US reviews. Its no-cost tier includes 1 GiB of Firestore storage, 10 GiB of egress a month and free auth up to 50K monthly active users. After that, the Blaze plan bills pay-as-you-go, and eligible accounts get up to $300 in Google Cloud credit. For a mobile app tied into Google services (push, analytics, crash reports), nothing is more integrated.

The downside: Firestore stores documents, not tables. Queries across collections push you to duplicate data, and per-operation billing is harder to forecast than a subscription. Leaving later means remodelling your data, whereas a Supabase database exports with standard Postgres tools.

Price
Free, then pay-as-you-go (Blaze)
Best for
Mobile apps, Google ecosystem
Limit
Documents, not relational tables
See Firebase pricing →
02

Convex: realtime built for TypeScript

Realtime

Convex replaces the database and the server with TypeScript functions whose results update live in the UI. It comes up in almost every English-language comparison, mostly from teams building collaborative apps. The Free & Starter plan costs nothing, Professional is $25 per developer per month, and Business & Enterprise starts at a $2,500 monthly minimum.

The downside: no SQL, and per-seat pricing grows with the team. A five-developer team on Professional pays $125 a month before usage, where Supabase Pro bills per organization.

Price
Free, then $25 per developer
Best for
TypeScript teams, collaborative apps
Limit
No SQL, per-seat pricing
See Convex pricing →
03

Neon: bare Postgres that scales to zero

Database only

Neon gives you the Postgres database, with branching and compute that scales down to zero when idle (after 5 minutes by default). The Free plan includes 100 CU-hours a month per project. Launch bills $0.106 per CU-hour plus $0.35 per GB-month of storage, and Neon itself puts typical Launch spend at about $15 a month.

The downside: you assemble file storage, functions and most of the API layer yourself. It is the right pick when those pieces already live elsewhere, for example in your framework.

Price
Free, then $0.106 per CU-hour
Best for
Developers who only want Postgres
Limit
No file storage or functions
See Neon pricing →
04

Appwrite: the same promise, open source

Open source

Appwrite covers the same ground as Supabase (database, auth, storage, functions), is open source and self-hosts well. Its pricing splits out the database: serverless has a $0 fixed fee with $10 of compute credits included every month, and a dedicated database starts at $10 a month. On Free, a project that hits a limit freezes and the console goes read-only instead of billing you.

The downside: Appwrite's default database is its own. Postgres or MySQL means a dedicated, paid database, so if you lean on Postgres extensions such as pgvector, Supabase is the shorter path.

Price
Free, dedicated DB from $10/mo
Best for
Teams that want to self-host
Limit
Postgres only on a dedicated DB
See Appwrite pricing →
05

Nhost: Postgres plus GraphQL, on a familiar rate card

GraphQL

Nhost looks a lot like Supabase: a dedicated Postgres database, auth, storage and functions, with a GraphQL API at the center instead of REST. The pricing is close too: free to start, Pro from $25 a month with $15 of compute credits (Supabase includes $10), and 10 GB of database included, then $0.20 per GB.

The downside: a much smaller community, so fewer tutorials and fewer AI coding tools that know it well. Pick it if your team already works in GraphQL.

Price
Free, then $25 a month
Best for
GraphQL teams
Limit
Smaller community
See Nhost pricing →
06

PocketBase: one binary, zero subscription

Free

PocketBase ships as a single file with SQLite, auth, file storage, realtime and an admin UI. It is free under the MIT license: you only pay for the server, and Reddit threads regularly mention it as the lighter option for side projects on a small VPS.

The downside: it has not reached version 1 yet, and its authors warn that backward compatibility is not guaranteed until then. Backups and upgrades are on you.

Price
Free, you pay the server
Best for
Side projects, internal tools
Limit
Still pre-1.0
Check out PocketBase →

Do you make a tool in this category? Email us: hello@hackceleration.com

Who is it for?

Is Supabase right for you?

Three situations, three answers. Then six checks to run before you put an app in production.

Yes, for an app with a developer on the team

A web or mobile app, a SaaS, an internal tool or an AI assistant that needs a real database, signed-in users and an API. Free is enough to validate the idea, and $25 Pro runs an app in production. To set it up cleanly from day one, our Supabase training starts from your actual project.

Careful if you expect lots of users or environments

Past 100,000 MAU, every user costs $0.00325: $1,300 a month at 500,000. And every project adds compute. Run the numbers with the table above and compare with Firebase or Appwrite. For a pure AI workload, also read our Supabase vs RunPod comparison.

No, if nobody on the team codes

Without a developer, RLS and SQL become a liability. Xano (4.1/5) offers a more guided no-code backend, and Bubble (4.2/5) or FlutterFlow (4.0/5) bundle the frontend and the data. If you would rather hand it off, our Supabase agency builds and secures your project.

  • RLS is enabled on every table, with at least one policy
  • The service_role key never appears in frontend code
  • You counted your projects (one compute bill each)
  • You estimated your MAU one year out
  • You picked an EU region if your customers are in the EU
  • You have a backup plan, especially on Free
FAQ · 9 questions

Frequently asked questions

  • Is Supabase really free?
    Yes, the Free plan has no time limit, but it caps you at 2 active projects, a 500 MB database per project and 50,000 monthly active users. Going past 500 MB does not lock the database: it goes read-only when its fixed 2 GB disk is 95% full, while an organization over the 500 MB quota can see its requests restricted. The real catch is elsewhere: a project with low activity for 7 days gets paused, and Free includes no backups. Paused projects do not count toward the 2-project limit.
  • Is Supabase good for production?
    Yes, on a paid plan. Pro never pauses, keeps daily backups for 7 days and covers 100,000 MAU, which is plenty for most SaaS apps. What makes production safe is your own setup: RLS on every table, the service_role key kept server-side, and point-in-time recovery (about $100 a month for 7 days) if losing a day of data is not an option.
  • What are Supabase's hidden costs?
    Three of them. Compute is billed per project, so staging adds at least $10 a month. Auth costs $0.00325 per user past 100,000 MAU, which is $1,300 a month at 500,000. And add-ons like point-in-time recovery, custom domains and IPv4 sit outside the spend cap. Disk and egress overages, by contrast, stay cheap: $0.125 per GB and $0.09 per uncached GB.
  • Does the spend cap stop all charges?
    No. It blocks overages on disk, egress, MAU, Edge Functions, realtime and storage, and restricts your service instead of billing you. It does not cover compute, point-in-time recovery, custom domains, IPv4, IOPS, log drains or phone MFA. It is an on/off switch, not a dollar budget, and it does not exist on Team or Enterprise.
  • Supabase vs Firebase: which should you pick?
    Supabase if your data is relational (customers, orders, invoices) and you want SQL. Firebase if you are building a mobile app deep in Google's ecosystem and your data is simple documents. Both give you 50,000 MAU free. The cost difference shows up later: Firebase bills per read and write, Supabase per project and per user over quota.
  • Why do people leave Supabase?
    The most cited reasons are auth costs at scale, surprise invoices and slow support when something breaks. Older write-ups also mention a flaky CLI and local development, and RLS without column-level granularity. Many teams keep the Postgres database and only move auth to a dedicated provider. Because it is just Postgres, leaving is easier than with most backends.
  • Can I self-host Supabase?
    Yes, the code is open source under Apache 2.0 and runs on your own server. But self-hosted Supabase lacks some features: no point-in-time recovery, a reduced Studio and missing logs. It also takes real ops skills. For a small self-hosted project, PocketBase is simpler to run.
  • Is Supabase HIPAA and SOC 2 compliant?
    Yes, on the right plan. Supabase holds SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001, with reports available on Team ($599 a month) and Enterprise. HIPAA is a paid add-on on Team and Enterprise, with a signed BAA. A DPA is available on request for GDPR.
  • Is Supabase good for AI apps?
    Yes, it is one of its strengths. The pgvector extension stores and compares embeddings inside your Postgres database, which is enough for most retrieval-based assistants. The official MCP server lets an assistant like Claude read your schema. For very large volumes, compare with a dedicated vector database like Pinecone.
Hack'celeration Lab

Get our next review in your inbox

One email when a new tool review or comparison goes live: real prices, hidden limits and our verdict.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.