IFTTT Alternatives

Six IFTTT alternatives, compared on price, speed and what they automate.

IFTTT is still one of the easiest ways to connect consumer apps and smart home devices, with a Free plan and paid plans from $25.08 a year. People leave when credits pause their Applets, when hourly polling on Free is too slow, or when they need real workflows. Home Assistant is the pick for a smart home, n8n for free self-hosting, Make for multi-step automations on a budget, and Zapier for the simplest switch for work apps.

Romain CochardCEO of Hack'celeration
Updated 20266alternatives compared5criteria each2026pricing checked

The ranking is editorial: a sponsored placement is always flagged on its card, and no affiliate link changes a score.

The honest take

Why people leave IFTTT

IFTTT is still one of the simplest ways to connect consumer apps and smart home devices: more than 1,000 services, Applets you can turn on in a click, and in 2026 every plan, Free included, unlocks all features and unlimited Applets. Paid plans are cheap: Starter costs $25.08 a year, Pro $65.88 a year, Pro+ $167.88 a year. People leave for the reasons below.

Credits now limit how often Applets run

In 2026 IFTTT moved to credits: Applet runs, MCP usage and AI features all use credits from a monthly allowance of 1,000 on Free, 5,000 on Starter, 20,000 on Pro and 100,000 on Pro+. When they run out, Applets pause until the next month or until you add more credits. An Applet that fires often, such as a sensor or a feed, can drain a Free allowance in days.

The Free plan checks triggers once an hour

IFTTT's plans page lists the polling speed, how often it checks your services for new triggers: every hour on Free, every 15 minutes on Starter, every 5 minutes on Pro and Pro+. For a notification or a smart home action, an hour is a long time. Zapier's Free plan polls every 15 minutes, and Home Assistant runs device automations locally, without polling the cloud.

Logic stays basic

IFTTT offers filters, queries, multi-actions and delays, but no visual branching, loops or error handling like Make, n8n or Power Automate. Users who chain several Applets to imitate a workflow end up with automations that are hard to debug. If you want AI in the loop, our guide to AI workflow automation compares the options. In 2020, when IFTTT first capped how many Applets a free account could run, forum users with dozens of custom Applets (one counted 77) discussed moving to Integromat (now Make) or to self-hosted Huginn.

Reliability complaints on triggers

Reviews from 2025 and 2026 describe triggers that fire late, sometimes by several hours, and Applets that keep failing; on one large consumer review site, IFTTT averages 1.6 out of 5. Support response time on IFTTT's plans page is 18 hours on Starter, 12 on Pro and 6 on Pro+, and the Free plan relies on the help center.

Billing surprises

Several 2025 and 2026 reviews describe being charged after cancelling a free trial, or for a plan they did not use. IFTTT no longer offers free trials and treats all payments as final and non-refundable, so cancel before the renewal date, in the App Store or Google Play if you subscribed from the phone app, and keep the confirmation email.

It is not built for business workflows

IFTTT's catalog leans to consumer apps, social networks and smart home devices. One account per service is the rule below Pro+, which is the only plan with multiple accounts per service, so a team managing several Gmail or social accounts hits the wall quickly.
1
Best for smart home automations

Home Assistant

4.3/5

Home Assistant is open source home automation software (Apache 2.0 license) that you run on your own hardware at home. It talks to your devices directly on your network, so an automation such as "turn the porch light on when the door opens" can fire right away instead of waiting for a cloud service to poll. That speed is a common reason smart home users leave IFTTT, whose Free plan checks for new triggers every hour. It works with over 1,000 brands of devices and services, through more than 1,600 integrations.

The software is free. The optional paid part is Home Assistant Link, the subscription called Home Assistant Cloud until its 2026 renaming: $6.50 a month on the monthly plan, or $65 a year (a year for the price of 10 months), tax not included, with a 31-day free trial and no card details required. It adds remote access from anywhere, offsite backups, voice control through Alexa and Google Home, voice processing and a dedicated support team for those features. Against IFTTT Pro at $65.88 billed annually, the annual Link plan costs almost exactly the same for a year, with no credit allowance: your automations run as often as they need to.

The limit is the setup. You need a small always-on computer at home, an afternoon to install it, and the patience to learn its automation editor. It does not connect web apps the way IFTTT does with Gmail or Google Sheets; for that, pair it with n8n or Make.

Standout features
  • Local control: automations run at home, without a cloud round trip
  • Free, open source software under the Apache 2.0 license
  • Alexa and Google Home voice control with Home Assistant Link
+Pros
  • ✓No credits and no per-run cost
  • ✓Works with over 1,000 device and service brands
  • ✓Your data stays in your home
−Cons
  • ✗Needs an always-on device at home and some setup time
  • ✗Learning curve far steeper than IFTTT's Applets
  • ✗Not built for web apps like Gmail or Sheets
Home Assistant vs IFTTT
CriterionHome AssistantIFTTT
PriceFree, Link $6.50/moFree, Pro $5.49/mo billed annually
Trigger speedLocal devices: near instantEvery hour on Free, every 5 min on Pro
Usage limitNone1,000 credits a month on Free
Where it runsYour hardware at homeIFTTT's cloud
Verdict

The best IFTTT replacement for a smart home, if you accept an evening of setup. Stay on IFTTT, or take Zapier, if your automations are mostly between web apps.

Get Home Assistant →
2
Best free self-hosted option

n8n

4.2/5

n8n is a workflow automation tool with a visual editor where each step is a node: triggers, apps, conditions, loops, code and AI agents. Where an IFTTT Applet links one trigger to a few actions, an n8n workflow can branch, wait, call an API, run JavaScript and ask a language model to decide what happens next. Its source code is public, but it is not open source in the strict sense: it is published under the Sustainable Use License, which lets you self-host it for your own use but not resell it as a service.

The self-hosted Community Edition costs nothing beyond your server. The cloud plans are priced on workflow executions, a run from start to finish however many steps it has: Starter costs $20 a month billed annually for 2,500 executions, Pro $50 a month billed annually for 10,000 executions. Compared with IFTTT Pro+ at $167.88 a year, n8n Starter costs $240 a year, but one execution covers a ten-step workflow that would need several IFTTT Applets.

The limit is the learning curve. n8n expects you to understand data, JSON and APIs; it is not the tool for "save my Instagram photos to Dropbox" in two clicks. Read our full n8n review and the n8n pricing breakdown before choosing a plan.

Standout features
  • Free self-hosted Community Edition
  • Priced per execution, unlimited steps per run
  • AI agents, code and HTTP requests in any workflow
+Pros
  • ✓Handles logic that would take several chained IFTTT Applets
  • ✓No per-step billing: long workflows cost the same as short ones
  • ✓Unlimited users and workflows on every cloud plan
−Cons
  • ✗Steeper learning curve than IFTTT, Zapier or Make
  • ✗Self-hosting means you maintain the server
  • ✗Sustainable Use License, not a classic open source license
n8n vs IFTTT
Criterionn8nIFTTT
Free optionSelf-hosted Community EditionFree plan, 1,000 credits a month
Entry paid plan$20/mo billed annually$2.09/mo billed annually
What is countedWorkflow executionsCredits
LogicBranches, loops, code, AI agentsFilters, queries, multi-actions
Verdict

Pick n8n if you outgrew IFTTT because your automations need logic. Pick Make if you want the same power with a gentler editor, or Zapier if you want no learning curve at all.

Try n8n →Read the full n8n review
3
Best value for visual multi-step workflows

Make

4.1/5

Make, formerly Integromat, builds automations called scenarios on a visual canvas: modules connected by lines, with routers to split a flow, filters to stop it and iterators to loop over a list. It sits between IFTTT and n8n: much more capable than an Applet, easier to read than n8n for a non-developer.

Make counts credits: most module actions use one credit, so a five-step scenario uses about five credits per run. The Free plan includes 1,000 credits a month. Core starts at $9 a month billed yearly for 10,000 credits ($10.59 month to month). IFTTT Pro+, at $13.99 a month billed annually, gives 100,000 credits, but an IFTTT credit and a Make credit are not the same unit, so compare on your own runs, not on the number. Read our Make review and the Make pricing guide for a real bill.

The limit: a trigger that checks an app for new data uses a credit on every check, even when nothing happened, and each item a module returns multiplies the credits used by the modules after it. Set a longer schedule on triggers that rarely change. Moving step by step? Make's IFTTT integration receives data from an Applet and sends data back to one, so IFTTT and Make can run side by side while you rebuild.

Standout features
  • Visual canvas with routers, filters and iterators
  • 10,000 credits from $9 a month billed yearly
  • Free plan with 1,000 credits a month
+Pros
  • ✓Far more logic than IFTTT for a few dollars more
  • ✓Easier to read than n8n for non-developers
  • ✓Large app catalog for business tools
−Cons
  • ✗Polling triggers use credits even when nothing happens
  • ✗Loops and iterators multiply credit use
  • ✗Few smart home device integrations compared with IFTTT
Make vs IFTTT
CriterionMakeIFTTT
Entry paid plan$9/mo billed yearly$2.09/mo billed annually
Free plan1,000 credits a month1,000 credits a month
Multi-step logicRouters, filters, iteratorsMulti-actions, filters, queries
Best atBusiness web appsConsumer apps and smart home
Verdict

The default pick for a small business leaving IFTTT for web app automations. Take Zapier if the app you need is missing from Make, or n8n if you want to self-host.

Try Make →Read the full Make review
4
Best for Microsoft 365 and Windows

Microsoft Power Automate

3.9/5

Power Automate is Microsoft's automation platform. It covers cloud flows, which connect apps the way IFTTT does, and desktop flows, which automate clicks and typing on a Windows computer (robotic process automation). It answers the question many IFTTT users ask: what is the Microsoft equivalent of IFTTT?

Power Automate Premium costs $15 per user per month, paid yearly, with cloud flows, attended desktop flows and standard, premium and custom connectors. A 30-day free trial lets you experiment with cloud flows. Unattended automation is sold per bot: Power Automate Process costs $150 per bot per month, paid yearly. The desktop side has a free entry point: Power Automate for desktop comes at no additional cost on Windows Home and above, ships with Windows 11, and you sign in with a personal Microsoft account to record desktop flows on your own PC. Against IFTTT Pro at $65.88 a year, Premium costs $180 a year per user: it is a business tool, priced like one.

The limit is the Microsoft world. Outside Outlook, Teams, SharePoint and Excel, connectors exist but the experience is less smooth, and the licensing has several layers. If you are leaving it, see what to switch to from Power Automate.

Standout features
  • Cloud flows and desktop flows (RPA) in one product
  • Deep Outlook, Teams, SharePoint and Excel integration
  • Microsoft security and admin controls
+Pros
  • ✓The natural choice in a Microsoft 365 company
  • ✓Automates Windows desktop apps, which IFTTT cannot reach
  • ✓Free desktop app on Windows, 30-day trial of cloud flows
−Cons
  • ✗$15 per user per month, paid yearly
  • ✗Unattended bots from $150 a month, paid yearly
  • ✗Layered licensing that takes time to understand
Microsoft Power Automate vs IFTTT
CriterionMicrosoft Power AutomateIFTTT
Entry paid plan$15/user/mo, paid yearly$2.09/mo billed annually
Desktop automationYes, on WindowsNo
Billing unitPer user, or per botPer account, credits
Free optionFree desktop app on Windows, 30-day cloud trialFree plan
Verdict

Pick Power Automate if your company lives in Microsoft 365. For a personal account or a smart home, it is far more than you need: stay on IFTTT or pick Home Assistant.

See Power Automate →
5
Easiest switch for web app automations

Zapier

3.8/5

Zapier is the best-known automation tool for web apps, and the closest in spirit to IFTTT: a trigger, then actions, built in a few clicks. Its strength is breadth: it connects more than 9,000 apps.

Zapier counts tasks: every step in a Zap uses tasks, with rates that vary by step type. The Free plan includes 100 tasks a month and two-step Zaps only, with a 15-minute polling time. Professional starts at $19.99 a month billed yearly ($29.99 month to month) for 750 tasks, with multi-step Zaps, premium apps and webhooks, and a 2-minute polling time. Against IFTTT Pro at $5.49 a month billed annually, Zapier Professional costs nearly four times more; what you buy is a faster, broader and more reliable tool for work apps. See our Zapier review and the Make vs Zapier comparison.

The limit is the bill at volume: 750 tasks go fast on multi-step Zaps, and 10,000 tasks cost $129 a month billed yearly on Professional.

Standout features
  • Integrations with more than 9,000 apps
  • Step-by-step trigger-and-action editor
  • 2-minute polling on Professional
+Pros
  • ✓Familiar trigger-and-action logic for IFTTT users
  • ✓Webhooks and multi-step Zaps on Professional
  • ✓AI steps, Tables and Forms on the same platform
−Cons
  • ✗Free plan limited to 100 tasks a month and two-step Zaps
  • ✗Expensive at volume
  • ✗Few smart home device integrations
Zapier vs IFTTT
CriterionZapierIFTTT
Free plan100 tasks a month, two-step Zaps1,000 credits a month, all features
Entry paid plan$19.99/mo billed yearly$2.09/mo billed annually
Polling, entry paid plan2 minutes15 minutes on Starter
Best atBusiness web appsConsumer apps and smart home
Verdict

The easiest move from IFTTT for web app automations, if you can pay for it. Pick Make for the same jobs at a lower price at volume.

Try Zapier →Read the full Zapier review
6
Best open source cloud alternative

Activepieces

3.7/5

Activepieces is a newer automation platform with a clean, step-by-step builder, AI agents, tables and MCP support. Its core is published under the MIT license (enterprise folders excepted), so you can run it on your own server, and it also runs in the cloud.

The unit is easy to read: a run is one credit, however many steps it has. AI steps are the exception: on Activepieces' own models, a step costs 2 credits on a fast model, 10 on a smart one and 20 on a frontier model, unless you bring your own AI keys on Plus or Team, which brings every AI step back to 1 credit. The Free plan includes 1,000 credits a month, unlimited flows and up to 5 users; its credits reset daily, and runs past the quota wait for the next day. Plus costs $20 flat per month for 10,000 credits, then $0.007 per extra credit. Team costs $200 a month for 50,000 credits and 25 users. Against IFTTT, Free is the same 1,000 credits a month, but each Activepieces credit covers a whole multi-step run.

The limit is maturity: about 770 integrations against more than 9,000 on Zapier, and support on Free and Plus is the community.

Standout features
  • One credit per run, whatever the number of steps (AI steps cost more)
  • MIT-licensed core, cloud or self-hosted
  • Up to 5 users on the Free plan
+Pros
  • ✓Simple, modern builder
  • ✓Clear overage price ($0.007 per credit)
  • ✓AI agents and MCP included
−Cons
  • ✗Smaller integration catalog than Zapier or Make
  • ✗Community support only on Free and Plus
  • ✗Free credits reset daily, so a burst waits until tomorrow
Activepieces vs IFTTT
CriterionActivepiecesIFTTT
Free plan1,000 credits a month, reset daily1,000 credits a month
Entry paid plan$20/mo flat$2.09/mo billed annually
What a credit coversA full run (AI steps extra)A share of a run
Self-hostingYesNo
Verdict

Pick Activepieces if you want a simple, open source cloud tool and predictable run pricing. Pick n8n for heavier logic, or Make for a bigger app catalog.

Try Activepieces →
At a glance

6 IFTTT alternatives compared

The six alternatives side by side, with the entry paid price as each pricing page shows it, labeled monthly or yearly. Each tool counts usage in a different unit, explained in the buyer's guide below. The edge column gives the main reason to pick each one over IFTTT. Tap a tool to jump to its breakdown.

Best forEdge over IFTTTFree planTeam sizeVisit
1Home AssistantBest for smart home automationsLocal, instant automations with no credits4.3/5Free (open source), Home Assistant Link $6.50/mo✓Smart home usersVisit →
2n8nBest free self-hosted optionFree self-hosting and complex logic4.2/5Free self-hosted, cloud from $20/mo billed annually✓Technical usersVisit →
3MakeBest value for visual multi-step workflowsMulti-step workflows at a low price4.1/5$9/mo billed yearly (Core), Free plan✓Freelancers, small teamsVisit →
4Microsoft Power AutomateBest for Microsoft 365 and WindowsMicrosoft 365 and Windows desktop automation3.9/5Free desktop app on Windows, Premium $15/user/mo paid yearly✓Microsoft 365 companiesVisit →
5ZapierEasiest switch for web app automations9,000+ apps, familiar trigger-and-action editor3.8/5$19.99/mo billed yearly (Professional), Free plan✓Non-technical teamsVisit →
6ActivepiecesBest open source cloud alternativeOne credit per run, MIT-licensed core3.7/5Free plan, Plus $20/mo flat✓Small teamsVisit →

IFTTT for reference: Free with 1,000 credits a month and hourly polling; Starter $25.08, Pro $65.88 and Pro+ $167.88 billed annually.

Is your tool missing from this page? Email us: hello@hackceleration.com

Buyer's guide

How to choose an IFTTT alternative

IFTTT belongs to automation platforms: software that watches a service for an event (the trigger) and then does something in another service (the action). "If a new photo is posted on Instagram, then save it to Dropbox" is the classic example, and the name of the tool. Under the hood, most of these platforms either poll a service, checking every few minutes whether something new happened, or receive a webhook, an instant message the service sends when the event occurs. Polling is why the same automation fires in seconds on one tool and after an hour on another.

The alternatives fall into three families. Consumer and smart home tools (IFTTT, Home Assistant, Apple Shortcuts) connect devices and personal apps. Business integration platforms (Zapier, Make, Power Automate, Activepieces) connect work apps with multi-step logic. Developer-friendly or self-hosted tools (n8n, Huginn, Activepieces) give you code, APIs and your own server. Start from the family your Applets belong to, not from the longest feature list.

Then compare the unit each tool counts, because the prices only make sense on the same unit. IFTTT counts credits, spent by Applet runs, AI features and MCP usage. Zapier counts tasks, used by every step of a Zap. Make counts credits, roughly one per module action. n8n counts executions, a whole workflow run however many steps. Activepieces counts one credit per run. Power Automate charges per user or per bot. Home Assistant counts nothing. Take your busiest Applet, count how many times it runs a month and how many steps it has, and price it on each tool. For a wider view of the category, see our ranking of the best automation platforms. If you outgrow the first choice later, our guides to Zapier alternatives, Make alternatives and the n8n vs Make and n8n vs Zapier comparisons go one level deeper.

If your Applets run a smart home

Home Assistant for local control and no usage limit, with Home Assistant Link at $6.50 a month for remote access and voice assistants. Keep IFTTT running for the devices you have not moved yet.

If your Applets connect personal apps

Stay on IFTTT if it works, or try Apple Shortcuts on an iPhone or Mac for on-device automations. For web apps, Zapier's Free plan is the easiest step up.

If you automate work

Make for value, Zapier for simplicity and catalog, Power Automate inside Microsoft 365. Ask for multi-step logic, error alerts, and several accounts per service.

If you want control and no subscription

n8n self-hosted, Activepieces self-hosted, or Huginn, an older open source agent system. You pay with your time and a server instead of a plan.

If price is your main reason

Two budget tools that several comparison guides list are worth a look before Zapier. Pabbly Connect sells 10,000 tasks a month for $16 billed yearly ($19 month to month), and only action steps use tasks. Integrately starts at $19.99 a month billed annually for 2,000 tasks. Both catalogs lean to business apps, not smart home devices.
  • Does the tool connect the exact apps and devices your Applets use today?
  • How often does it check for triggers on the plan you can afford, or does it use webhooks?
  • What unit does it count, and how many units does your busiest automation use a month?
  • What happens when you run out: overage fee, pause, or wait until tomorrow?
  • Can it branch, loop and alert you when a step fails?
  • Can you connect several accounts of the same service?
  • Can you export or self-host your automations if prices change again?
FAQ · 8 questions

IFTTT alternatives: FAQ

  • What is the Apple version of IFTTT?
    Apple Shortcuts is the closest Apple equivalent: its personal automations run on your iPhone or iPad when something happens, such as arriving at or leaving a place, opening an app, tapping an NFC tag or reaching a battery level. Some of them can run without asking you first. It works on your device rather than in the cloud, so it pairs well with Home Assistant for devices and with Zapier or Make for web apps.
  • What happens when IFTTT credits run out?
    Your Applets pause until the next month or until you add more credits, and nothing is deleted. Pro and Pro+ subscribers who already used more than their new allowance when credits arrived in 2026 received a one-time boost of extra credits, sized to their past usage.
  • How do I cancel an IFTTT subscription?
    If you subscribed on ifttt.com, open the Billing page and click Cancel; if you subscribed in the iPhone or Android app, cancel in the App Store or Google Play. Cancelling only stops the renewal: you keep Pro or Pro+ features until the end of the billing cycle, then the account drops to Free, with its 1,000 monthly credits and hourly checks.
  • Can I export my IFTTT Applets to another tool?
    Plan to rebuild them in the new tool, one Applet at a time. List your Applets with their trigger, filter and actions, rebuild the busiest first, and keep IFTTT running until each new automation has fired correctly at least once. If you move to Make, its IFTTT modules can receive data from an Applet and send data back to one, so both tools can work together during the move.
  • Do IFTTT Webhooks still need a paid plan?
    No. Since IFTTT switched to credits in 2026, every service, Webhooks included, works on every plan, Free included; older tutorials that say Webhooks need Pro predate the change. Each Applet run still spends credits, so a webhook that fires often counts against the 1,000 monthly credits of the Free plan.
  • Is Huginn a good free alternative to IFTTT?
    It can be, for technical users: Huginn is an MIT-licensed system of agents you host yourself to watch websites, feeds and APIs and act on them. It takes more setup than n8n or Activepieces and has a dated interface, so n8n is the easier start for free self-hosting.
  • Why are my IFTTT Applets so slow?
    Usually because of polling: on the Free plan, IFTTT checks your services for new triggers every hour, so an event can wait up to an hour. Upgrading to Pro brings it to 5 minutes; for near-instant smart home actions, a local tool like Home Assistant avoids polling entirely.
  • Can IFTTT and Home Assistant work together?
    Yes. Home Assistant's IFTTT integration can trigger Applets through IFTTT Webhooks and turn incoming IFTTT webhooks into events that start automations. To receive them, your Home Assistant must be reachable from the internet, or use the webhook URL that comes with Home Assistant Link. That lets you move your devices to Home Assistant and keep IFTTT only for the few services that integrate nowhere else.
Hack'celeration Lab

Get the next breakdown in your inbox

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.