Postman alternatives: where to go and how to move your collections
Five destinations, one for each reason to leave, and a seven-step migration plan.
The short answer: Bruno if you want your collections in your Git repo, with no account and no cloud; Insomnia if you want the closest thing to Postman, free for teams of up to 3 on Git Sync; Hoppscotch if you want a client in the browser or on your own server; Apidog if a team of 2 to 4 wants an all-in-one platform without paying; Thunder Client if you live in VS Code. Why is everyone searching in 2026? Postman's Free plan now covers a single user, and a free team with several members goes read-only. We compared the five destinations, their official pricing, and what each one actually keeps from a Postman export.
Some links may be affiliate links. The ranking is editorial: a sponsored spot is always labeled on its card, and no affiliate link changes a score.
Why so many teams are leaving Postman
Postman is still the most complete API client out there, and the best documented. People don't leave over features. They leave over three things: per-seat pricing, a mandatory account and cloud, and an app that grew into a platform when most users just want to send requests. Here are six reasons, each checked against Postman's own pages in 2026.
Free now means one person
Until early 2026, the Free plan let you create a team and invite up to 3 collaborators. Not anymore: Free is limited to one user and can't create a team. If your small team shared collections for free, that model is gone. Solo ($9 a month, billed annually) doesn't fix it either, since it's single-user too.
Your free team goes read-only
A Free team with several members switches to read-only. Postman keeps one admin with edit rights, picked by role and then by recent activity. Everyone else loses edit access to shared workspaces and keeps only their personal ones. The way out is a paid plan, or removing members until one is left.
Team is billed per seat
The first plan that lets a second person in, Team, costs $19 per user per month, billed annually. For 5 developers that's $95 a month, or $1,140 a year, for a tool many people mostly use to fire requests and rerun collections. On Hacker News, the complaint keeps coming back: per-user pricing adds up fast once the team grows.
An account and the cloud, even solo
The Scratch Pad, which kept collections offline without an account, reached end of life in 2023 (version 10.18). The lightweight offline client sends requests but doesn't handle collections. In the GitHub issue from that time, one developer wrote: "My employer doesn't allow signing in nor signing up." If your company bans storing API calls with a third party, that's a blocker.
Your collections live outside your repo
In Postman, a collection lives in an online workspace, not next to the code it exercises. A request change never goes through a pull request, and the collection version doesn't follow the API version. That's the core pitch of Git-first tools like Bruno: the collection becomes a folder of plain-text files, versioned with everything else.
AI and monitoring add meters
Free includes 1,000 monitoring requests a month and a small AI credit allowance; on paid plans, extra AI credits cost $0.035 to $0.05 each depending on the plan, and Free can't buy more. Not a dealbreaker, but it's one more meter on a tool you open every day. If you don't use monitors, the AI agent or Flows, you're paying for a platform you only use a slice of.
You're leaving because… go to…
The right Postman alternative depends on what's pushing you out. Usually one line fits. Each card links to the full profile below.
Plain-text files in your repo, reviewed in pull requests.
You want the gentlest switchInsomniaFamiliar UI, most pm.* scripts converted on import.
Your team of 3 won't payInsomniaGit Sync is free for up to 3 users.
You want a browser or self-hosted clientHoppscotchNothing to install, and a self-hostable edition.
Your team of 4 wants a free all-in-oneApidogFree for up to 4 users: design, mocks and docs.
You spend your day in VS CodeThunder ClientAn extension, with paid plans from $3 a month.
Postman alternatives, tool by tool
For each tool: why move to it, who it's for, its limit, how to migrate from Postman, and what it costs. Prices are what vendors list in 2026, in dollars, billed annually.
The tools
Bruno: when your collections belong in Git
Closest to your codeWhy move to Bruno. Bruno saves every request as a plain-text file in a folder you pick. Drop it into your API's repo, and a request change ships in the same pull request as the code. No account, no cloud sync: that answers the two biggest complaints about Postman head-on. The app is open source and handles HTTP, REST, GraphQL and gRPC on the free edition.
Who it's for. Dev teams that already run everything through Git, and companies that can't store API calls with a third party.
Who it's not for. Teams where QA or product folks never touch Git: sharing one request means cloning a repo. Bruno also has no mock server and no monitoring.
Its limit. The free edition caps you at 2 workspaces and basic Git actions (clone, diff, commit). Push, branching, data-driven runs and reports need a paid plan. Pro is $6 per user per month, Ultimate $11.
How to migrate. Export each collection as v2.1, then Import Collection in Bruno. Common calls (pm.test, pm.environment, pm.response) get translated. Importing a full Postman data dump (the ZIP) is an Ultimate feature; on free, you go collection by collection. Environments import one at a time, and every value becomes a string: port 5000 turns into "5000", so check your comparisons.
- Free
- open source, unlimited runner
- Paid
- Pro $6/user/mo
- Best for
- Git teams, local data
- Limit
- no mocks or monitors
Insomnia: the gentlest switch
Closest to PostmanWhy move to Insomnia. Its UI and mental model are the closest to Postman: collections, environments, pre-request and after-response scripts, a runner, mocks. The free Essentials plan keeps unlimited local and cloud projects, an unlimited runner, and free Git Sync for up to 3 users. For a team of 3 that just lost Postman's free tier, it's the most direct exit.
Who it's for. Teams that want to change tools without changing habits, and teams heavy on GraphQL or gRPC.
Who it's not for. People fleeing Postman because of the forced login: Insomnia went through the same backlash with version 8 in 2023, then added a local Scratch Pad that needs no account.
Its limit. The free mock server stops at 1,000 requests a month, and past 3 people on Git Sync you need Pro at $12 per user per month. Enterprise is $45, self-serve up to 50 users.
How to migrate. Kong publishes an official guide: import a Postman ZIP or separate JSON files, v2.0 or v2.1 collections. Most scripts convert on import (pm.environment becomes insomnia.environment). Mock servers don't carry over, so recreate them. In CI, inso run collection replaces Newman.
- Free
- Git Sync up to 3 users
- Paid
- Pro $12/user/mo
- Best for
- switching without relearning
- Limit
- mocks not imported
Hoppscotch: a client in your browser, or on your server
Nothing to installWhy move to Hoppscotch. Hoppscotch opens in a browser tab, no install, and also ships a desktop app. It's open source and self-hostable, so your team can keep collections on its own server. The free cloud plan covers REST, GraphQL and realtime (WebSocket), with collections, environments, scripts and a runner.
Who it's for. Developers who want a fast, light client, locked-down machines where you can't install software, and teams that want to host their own tooling.
Who it's not for. Teams with script-heavy collections: Postman script import is still experimental.
Its limit. Free cloud is a personal workspace. Team workspaces, mocking and published docs need Business at $6 per user per month. Enterprise (SSO, SCIM, audit logs) is $11.
How to migrate. The importer takes Postman collections and environments as JSON. Pre-request and test scripts only come across if you turn on Experimental Script Import, and advanced auth and collection-level settings aren't imported. Plan to redo auth on each collection by hand.
- Free
- personal cloud workspace
- Paid
- Business $6/user/mo
- Best for
- browser, self-hosting
- Limit
- scripts import as experimental
Apidog: stay on a platform, free up to 4
All-in-oneWhy move to Apidog. If your team uses Postman for everything (API design, docs, mocks, test scenarios), Apidog covers that scope in one tool. Its free plan allows up to 4 users, where Postman now allows one. Its scripting engine follows Postman's pm syntax, so most scripts run without a rewrite.
Who it's for. Small product teams that design APIs before coding them and want docs and mocks in the same place.
Who it's not for. Anyone leaving Postman to get back to a light or local tool: Apidog is an online platform with an account too.
Its limit. Past 4 people, Basic costs $9 per user per month, billed annually. On migration, pm.nextRequest() isn't supported: conditional chains get rebuilt as a test scenario with if conditions.
How to migrate. Two paths: import a v2.1 collection file (Settings, Import Data, Postman), or connect your Postman API key and pull everything at once. A Postman collection becomes an Apidog project, and its collection variables become project-level globals. Check the environment named after the collection afterward.
- Free
- up to 4 users
- Paid
- Basic $9/user/mo
- Best for
- design, mocks and docs together
- Limit
- no pm.nextRequest()
Thunder Client: stay inside VS Code
In the editorWhy move to Thunder Client. It's a VS Code extension: you send requests from the editor without switching windows. If you only open Postman to hit your routes while coding, this is faster than a separate app. Its paid plans are the cheapest on this page, with Starter at $3 per user per month.
Who it's for. Developers who spend the day in VS Code and keep modest collections.
Who it's not for. QA teams with big suites, or anyone who doesn't use VS Code.
Its limit. The free plan is tight: 3 collections of up to 50 requests, 5 imports a month, runner and reports via CLI only, no Git Sync and no custom scripting. Business is $7 and Enterprise $16 per user per month.
How to migrate. In the collections menu, pick Import and choose your Postman file. With 5 imports a month on free, merge collections first or start with the ones you use most. If a large file won't go through, re-export it from Postman as v2.1.
- Free
- 3 collections, 50 requests each
- Paid
- Starter $3/user/mo
- Best for
- VS Code developers
- Limit
- 5 imports a month on free
The 5 alternatives side by side
Our default pick: Bruno for a team that lives in Git, Insomnia to switch without relearning. For a sense of scale, take a team of 5 developers on annual billing: Postman Team runs $95 a month, Insomnia Pro $60, Apidog Basic $45, Thunder Client Business $35, Bruno Pro and Hoppscotch Business $30 each. One row per tool: free plan on the left, first paid tier and migration path on the right.
| Free plan | First paid tier and migration | |
|---|---|---|
| PostmanWhere you're leaving | 1 user, no team, 1,000 monitoring requests a month | Solo $9 a month (1 person), Team $19 per user per month |
| BrunoGit, local | Open source, unlimited runner, 2 workspaces | Pro $6 per user per month; import per v2.1 collection, full dump on Ultimate |
| InsomniaClosest match | Unlimited projects, Git Sync up to 3 users, mocks 1,000 requests a month | Pro $12 per user per month; imports the Postman ZIP, converts scripts |
| HoppscotchBrowser | Personal workspace, collections, scripts, runner | Business $6 per user per month; scripts via experimental import |
| ApidogPlatform | Up to 4 users | Basic $9 per user per month; import by file or Postman API key |
| Thunder ClientVS Code | 3 collections of 50 requests, 5 imports a month | Starter $3 per user per month; Postman file import |
Vendors' public prices in 2026, in US dollars, per user per month on annual billing, before tax.
Move off Postman in seven steps
Order matters. Each step protects something: your collections, your secrets, your CI, your team's work.
The steps
Inventory what runs in Postman
Day 1List your workspaces, collections, environments, globals, mock servers, monitors, Flows, and every CI job that runs Newman or the Postman CLI. Note who uses what.
Why bother? A Postman export only holds collections and environments. Everything else gets rebuilt by hand, and anything you didn't write down gets forgotten.
- Time
- about an hour for a small team
- Risk if skipped
- a broken CI job
Export all data, and globals separately
Day 1Go to Settings, Account settings, Export Data, tick collections and environments, then Request Data Export. The link arrives by email and expires after 2 days, so download it right away. On a team, only Admin and Super Admin roles can run a bulk export.
Catch: global variables aren't in the dump. Export them separately from the Variables pane. For a single collection, use More, Export collection, v2.1.
- Link valid
- 2 days
- Not in the export
- globals, mocks, monitors
Pull secrets out before you commit
SecurityExported environments often hold API keys and tokens in plain text. If your destination writes everything to Git (Bruno, Insomnia with Git Sync), split secret values out before the first commit: a gitignored file, the tool's secret variables, or a secrets manager.
A token pushed to a shared repo should be treated as leaked. Rotate it.
- Rule
- no secrets in the first commit
Import, then rerun every collection
Day 2Import collections, then environments. Run each collection once in the destination's runner and compare results with a Postman run. Gaps almost always come from three places: auth inherited from the collection, variables that became strings, and scripts that call a Postman-only function.
- Check
- auth, variable types, scripts
Rewrite what won't convert
Per toolSearch your scripts for pm.sendRequest, pm.nextRequest, pm.vault and any require of newman, postman-collection or @postman. Those break most often. Apidog skips pm.nextRequest; Bruno has no equivalent for @postman packages; Hoppscotch imports scripts only in experimental mode.
Run a text search on the exported JSON before importing, and you'll know right away how many requests are affected.
- Tip
- grep the JSON for pm.nextRequest
Replace Newman in CI
Day 3A Newman job reads a Postman collection. Swap it for your destination's CLI: bru run for Bruno, inso run collection for Insomnia, or the Hoppscotch and Apidog CLIs. Keep the old job running in parallel for a week, then cut it once both give the same results.
- Bruno
- bru run
- Insomnia
- inso run collection
Move the team, then scale Postman down
Week 2Recreate the mocks and monitors you still need, announce a cutover date, then scale your Postman account down. Keep a Free account while you double-check: your collections stay viewable there, and you can still export.
- Keep
- a Free account while you check
What makes a Postman migration fail
The same mistakes show up team after team, in GitHub issues and in vendors' import guides. None are hard to avoid once you know them.
Assuming the export has everything
A Postman export means collections and environments. Globals, mocks, monitors, Flows and history stay behind. Inventory first.
Letting the export link expire
The full export link lasts 2 days. Request it on a Friday and it may be dead by Monday. Request it when you can download it the same day.
Pushing tokens to Git
Moving to a file-based tool also means you can commit environments with their keys. Split out secrets before the first commit.
Forgetting CI
The day you delete the Postman workspace, a Newman job that fetches a collection by ID stops working. Replace it before you close anything.
Picking a local tool for a non-technical team
Bruno is great for developers and painful for a PM who never clones a repo. If non-developers browse your collections, look at Insomnia, Hoppscotch or Apidog.
Comparing prices without counting seats
Per-user pricing multiplies. At 5 people, Postman Team is $95 a month; Bruno Pro is $30. At 3 people, Insomnia can cost nothing. Run the numbers on your real team, and check our roundup of AI coding tools for developers if you're reviewing the rest of your tooling too.
- Inventory of collections, environments, globals, mocks, monitors and Newman jobs
- Full export downloaded before it expires (2 days)
- Globals exported separately
- Secrets pulled out of environments before any commit
- Every collection rerun and compared with Postman
- pm.nextRequest, pm.sendRequest and @postman packages checked
- CI job replaced and run in parallel for a week
- Mocks and monitors recreated if needed
- Postman account scaled down only after checking
Postman alternatives: frequently asked questions
Is there a free alternative to Postman?
Yes, several. Bruno's open source edition has an unlimited runner and shares collections through Git. Insomnia is free for teams of up to 3 on Git Sync. Apidog is free for up to 4 users. Hoppscotch is free in the browser for personal use.
Is Postman still free in 2026?
For one person, yes. Free stays at $0 with the collection runner and mocks, but it can't create a team. The moment a second person joins, you need Team at $19 per user per month, billed annually.
What happens to my free Postman team?
If it has several members, it goes read-only. One admin keeps edit rights, and everyone else keeps their personal workspaces. Use that window to run the full export: it has to be done by an admin.
Is Bruno better than Postman?
For a dev team that wants collections in Git, yes: it's free, offline and reviewable in pull requests. For mocks, monitoring or non-technical teammates, Postman still does more. Bruno has no mock server and no monitors.
Will my Postman test scripts work elsewhere?
Mostly. Bruno translates pm.test, pm.environment and pm.response; Insomnia converts most scripts; Apidog follows pm syntax but not pm.nextRequest. Scripts that require newman or @postman packages have no equivalent anywhere, so rewrite those.
What replaces Newman in CI?
Your destination's CLI: bru run for Bruno, inso run collection for Insomnia, or the Hoppscotch and Apidog CLIs. Run old and new jobs side by side for a few days before you remove Newman.
What about Yaak?
Yaak is free for personal use; for work, a license is $79 a year for one person or $149 per user per year on Business. We didn't rank it because we couldn't confirm its Postman collection import on an official source.
Get the next migration guide in your inbox
One tool to leave, one destination, one migration plan. Nothing else.