LangSmith Alternatives
Six tools to replace <em>LangSmith</em>, priced per trace, span, seat and day of retention.
LangSmith is LangChain's platform for tracing, evaluating and monitoring LLM apps, and people leave it for its pricing: $39 per seat a month on Plus, $5 per 1,000 traces past the included 10k, 14 days of retention on base traces, and self-hosting only on Enterprise. For the closest replacement with unlimited users and a free self-hosted version, take Langfuse; for free tracing on your own servers, Arize Phoenix; for teams that live in evals, Braintrust. Below are the six alternatives we compared, with each price read on its pricing page and the unit it is billed on.
The ranking is editorial: a sponsored spot is always flagged on its card, and no affiliate link changes a score.
Why teams look past LangSmith
LangSmith is the observability and evaluation platform made by the LangChain team. It records each run of your LLM app or agent as a trace, with every model call, tool call and retrieval inside it, lets you score those runs with evaluators, and stores prompts and datasets. It works with or without the LangChain framework, and its LangChain integration is the smoothest on the market. People rarely leave it because tracing fails; they leave because of how the bill and the data rules are built. Here are the reasons that come back most, each tied to a fact you can check.
You pay per seat, and the free plan has one
Traces past the quota cost $5 per thousand
Base traces are kept for 14 days
Self-hosting is an Enterprise feature
More products now bill in LSUs
Custom SSO and fine-grained access need Enterprise
Langfuse
Langfuse is the name that comes back most often when developers talk about leaving LangSmith, and it does the same three jobs: it records every step of an LLM call or agent run as a trace, lets you score those traces with evaluations, and keeps your prompts under version control. It plugs into LangChain through a callback handler that captures model calls, tools and retrievers, so a LangChain app can switch with a few lines of setup. It also takes traces from OpenTelemetry on its own endpoint, so code that is not built on LangChain works as well.
The pricing model is the main reason to move. LangSmith bills per seat and per trace; Langfuse bills per unit, where a unit is any tracing data point you send, such as a trace, an observation inside it or a score, and every paid plan has unlimited users. Hobby is free with 50k units a month, 30 days of data access and 2 users. Core costs $29 a month for 100k units and 90 days of data access, then $8 per 100k units up to 1 million, $7 per 100k from 1 to 10 million. Pro, at $199 a month, extends data access to 3 years and adds higher rate limits. The code outside the enterprise folders is under the MIT license, and ClickHouse, which bought Langfuse in 2026, says it plans no licensing change. If you already run it and want to compare further, see our Langfuse alternatives.
- Unlimited users on Core, Pro and Enterprise
- MIT-licensed core you can self-host for free
- Native OpenTelemetry endpoint and a LangChain callback handler
- ✓Core at $29 a month costs less than one LangSmith Plus seat at $39
- ✓90 days of data access on Core, against 14 days for LangSmith base traces
- ✓Volume price drops to $7 per 100k units above 1 million
- ✗Each observation and score counts as a unit, so a long agent run uses many units
- ✗Self-hosting means running Postgres, ClickHouse, Redis and object storage
- ✗SOC 2 Type II report only from Pro
| Criterion | Langfuse | LangSmith |
|---|---|---|
| Entry paid plan | $29/mo, unlimited users | $39/seat/mo |
| Self-hosting | Free, MIT core | Enterprise only |
| Data kept on entry paid plan | 90 days | 14 days (base traces) |
Take Langfuse if you want LangSmith's feature set with flat team pricing or your own servers. If you only need evals and experiments run by a product team, Braintrust fits better.
Arize Phoenix
Arize Phoenix is the open, self-hosted product of Arize, the company behind the Arize AX cloud platform. Phoenix records traces of your LLM and agent runs, lets you run evaluations on them, and gives you datasets and experiments to compare prompt or model changes. It ships as Docker images and Helm charts, and Arize states that self-hosting comes with no license fees, no usage limits and no feature gates. That last point is the opposite of LangSmith, where self-hosting and hybrid deployment are reserved for the Enterprise plan at a custom price.
Read the license before you call it open source: Phoenix is under the Elastic License 2.0, which lets you use and modify it inside your company but forbids offering it to others as a managed service. For a team that runs it for itself, that changes nothing. If you would rather not host anything, Arize AX is the cloud route. AX Free gives 25k spans and 1 GB of ingestion a month; AX Pro costs $50 a month for 50k spans and 10 GB. A span is one step inside a trace, so with ten steps per run, AX Pro covers about 5,000 runs a month, half of what a single LangSmith Plus seat includes. Arize does not publish a price per extra span on that page, so ask before you pass the quota.
- Self-hosted with no license fees, usage limits or feature gates
- Docker, Docker Compose and Helm deployment
- A cloud path on Arize AX from $50 a month
- ✓The full product costs nothing when you host it yourself
- ✓Lighter to run than a stack built on ClickHouse
- ✓Evaluations and experiments included in the free version
- ✗Elastic License 2.0, not an OSI open source license
- ✗AX Pro includes only 50k spans a month
- ✗No published overage price per extra span
| Criterion | Arize Phoenix | LangSmith |
|---|---|---|
| Entry paid plan | AX Pro $50/mo | $39/seat/mo |
| Self-hosting | Free, ELv2 | Enterprise only |
| Free cloud quota | 25k spans/mo | 5k base traces/mo |
Take Phoenix if you can host a container and want tracing and evals at zero license cost. If you want a hosted tool with many users and a large span quota, Langfuse Core or Opik Pro Cloud costs less.
Braintrust
Braintrust starts from evaluation rather than from tracing. You build datasets, write scorers, run experiments on each prompt or model change and compare the results side by side; production logs feed back into the same datasets. It also has Loop, an assistant inside the product that helps you write scorers and improve prompts. Teams that use LangSmith mainly for its evaluation features, not for LangChain debugging, often find Braintrust closer to how they work.
The pricing unit is data, not traces or seats, and every plan includes unlimited users. Starter is free with 1 GB of processed data, 10k scores and 14 days of retention, then $4 per GB and $2.50 per 1,000 scores. Pro costs $249 a month for 5 GB, 50k scores and 30 days of retention, then $3 per GB, $1.50 per 1,000 scores and $0.50 per GB per month for longer retention. That flat fee is high for a small team: three LangSmith Plus seats cost $117 a month. It becomes cheap when ten or twenty people need access. The platform itself is closed source, its SDKs are under Apache 2.0, and only Enterprise adds a bring-your-own-cloud deployment that keeps the data in your own cloud; Starter and Pro run on Braintrust's SaaS. Below Enterprise, single sign-on is Google only. If Braintrust is already on your list, our Braintrust alternatives show where its users go.
- Unlimited users on every plan
- Experiments, scorers and datasets at the center of the product
- Bring-your-own-cloud deployment on Enterprise
- ✓No seat count to manage as the team grows
- ✓Clear overage prices per GB and per 1,000 scores
- ✓Loop helps write scorers and improve prompts
- ✗Pro starts at $249 a month before any overage
- ✗Platform is closed source; no free self-hosted version
- ✗SSO limited to Google below Enterprise
| Criterion | Braintrust | LangSmith |
|---|---|---|
| Entry paid plan | $249/mo, unlimited users | $39/seat/mo |
| Free plan | 1 GB, 10k scores, 14 days | 5k base traces, 1 seat |
| Pricing unit | GB of data and scores | Seats and traces |
Take Braintrust if evals drive your releases and many people need access. If you are one or two developers who mostly debug traces, Langfuse or Opik costs a fraction of $249.
Opik (Comet)
Opik is Comet's open source platform for tracing, evaluating and monitoring LLM apps and agents. It covers what most teams use LangSmith for: traces of each run, LLM-as-a-judge evaluations with more than 30 ready metrics, datasets and experiments, prompt management, plus an agent optimizer that tunes prompts for you, and, on the self-hosted version, guardrails that block PII and unwanted topics. Its code is under the Apache 2.0 license, a permissive license like Langfuse's MIT core, so you can run it, change it and even host it for others.
The hosted plans are the cheapest here. Free Cloud covers up to 10 team members and 25k spans a month. Pro Cloud costs $19 a month for up to 50 team members, 100k spans and 60 days of retention, then $5 per 100k extra spans. Keeping spans longer than 60 days costs $29 per 100k spans, almost six times the price of ingesting them, so set retention before you raise it. A self-hosted Opik has unlimited spans and retention, and it is where the guardrails live: Comet offers them for self-hosted deployment, not on Free Cloud, Pro Cloud or Enterprise. It also comes without user management, which matters if several teams share one instance. The Free plan cannot buy extra spans.
- Apache 2.0 license on the open source platform
- Pro Cloud at $19 a month for 50 members
- Agent optimizer included; guardrails when self-hosted
- ✓$5 per 100k extra spans on Pro Cloud
- ✓Up to 10 members free, 50 on Pro Cloud
- ✓More than 30 built-in evaluation metrics
- ✗Extra retention costs $29 per 100k spans
- ✗Self-hosted version has no user management
- ✗Free Cloud cannot buy extra spans
| Criterion | Opik (Comet) | LangSmith |
|---|---|---|
| Entry paid plan | $19/mo, up to 50 members | $39/seat/mo |
| Overage | $5 per 100k spans | $5 per 1,000 base traces |
| License | Apache 2.0 | Closed platform, MIT SDK |
Take Opik if budget and license matter most, and self-host it if you want its guardrails. If you need long retention on a hosted plan, Langfuse Core keeps 90 days for $29.
W&B Weave
Weave is the LLM tracing and evaluation product of Weights & Biases, now part of CoreWeave. You add a decorator to the functions you want to follow, and Weave records inputs, outputs, cost and latency for each call, then lets you build evaluations and compare versions of a prompt or model. Its strength is that it lives next to W&B experiment tracking: a team that fine-tunes models and then ships them in an app keeps training runs, model versions and production traces in one place, which LangSmith does not cover.
Pricing is by data volume. The Free plan costs $0 a month with 1 GB of Weave data ingestion and 5 GB of storage. Pro starts at $60 a month billed monthly, with 1.5 GB of Weave ingestion and 100 GB of storage, then extra ingestion billed per megabyte, $0.10 per MB on Pro, which works out to $100 per extra GB. That rate is the trap: a chatty agent that logs long prompts and documents can pass 1.5 GB quickly, so check your average trace size first. Volume discounts come with annual commitments. One more limit sits in the plan description: Pro is meant for early-stage teams of fewer than 50 employees, and a company above that is required to move to the Enterprise plan, priced on request. The Weave SDK is under Apache 2.0, but the W&B platform you send data to is a commercial service.
- Traces and evals next to W&B experiment tracking
- Decorator-based tracing for any Python or TypeScript code
- Apache 2.0 SDK
- ✓One tool for model training and LLM app monitoring
- ✓Free plan with 1 GB of Weave ingestion a month
- ✓Volume discounts on annual commitments
- ✗Extra ingestion costs $0.10 per MB on Pro
- ✗Pro includes only 1.5 GB of Weave ingestion
- ✗Most useful if you already use Weights & Biases
| Criterion | W&B Weave | LangSmith |
|---|---|---|
| Entry paid plan | From $60/mo | $39/seat/mo |
| Pricing unit | GB of ingestion | Seats and traces |
| Model training tracking | Yes, W&B | No |
Take Weave if your team already lives in Weights & Biases. If you only run an LLM app and log large payloads, Langfuse or Opik price volume more gently.
Datadog LLM Observability
Datadog LLM Observability adds LLM and agent tracing to the monitoring platform many engineering teams already pay for. Each model call shows up as a span you can correlate with APM services, infrastructure signals and real user sessions, so a slow answer can be traced to a database or a network issue, not only to the prompt. It also runs out-of-the-box checks for hallucinations and prompt injection attempts, and lets you run evaluations and experiments. For a platform team, the gain is one tool, one on-call process and one bill instead of LangSmith next to Datadog.
The free tier covers up to 40K LLM spans a month with 15 days of retention and unlimited evaluations. Pro starts at $160 a month on annual billing, or $240 on-demand, with 100K LLM spans; extra spans cost $3.50 per 10K on annual billing, $4.20 month-to-month and $5 on-demand. Only spans that call a model are billed, not tool, retrieval or workflow spans, which favors agents with many tool steps. Retention is where the bill grows: 30 days costs $6.50 per 10K spans a month and 90 days $9, more than twice the span price itself. Our Datadog switch guide covers the wider platform and why some teams leave it.
- LLM spans linked to APM, infrastructure and real user monitoring
- Hallucination and prompt injection checks
- Only LLM spans are billed, not tool or retrieval spans
- ✓Free tier with 40K LLM spans a month and no card
- ✓Unlimited evaluations on the free tier
- ✓No new vendor if Datadog already runs your monitoring
- ✗15-day retention by default; 90 days costs $9 per 10K spans a month
- ✗No self-hosted option
- ✗The headline Pro price assumes annual billing
| Criterion | Datadog LLM Observability | LangSmith |
|---|---|---|
| Entry paid plan | $160/mo annual, $240 on-demand | $39/seat/mo |
| Free quota | 40K LLM spans/mo | 5k base traces/mo |
| Default retention | 15 days | 14 days (base traces) |
Take Datadog if your company already runs on it and wants LLM traces next to APM. If you need long retention or self-hosting, Langfuse or Phoenix costs far less.
6 LangSmith alternatives compared
Scores are our editorial score on five criteria (tracing and debugging, evaluations, value for money, self-hosting and data control, ease of setup); the overall score is their simple average. Prices were read on each pricing page in 2026. LangSmith starts at $0 for 1 seat and 5k base traces a month, then $39 per seat a month on Plus. The edge column says what each tool does better than LangSmith for a team that leaves it.
| Best for | Edge over LangSmith | Free plan | Team size | Visit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Langfuse | Best overall, and best for self-hosting | Unlimited users from $29 a month and a free MIT self-hosted core | 4.4/5 | Hobby free (50k units/mo); Core $29/mo billed monthly | ✓ | Startups to enterprises | Visit → |
| 2 | Arize Phoenix | Best free self-hosted tracing | Free self-hosting with no usage limits or feature gates | 4.3/5 | Phoenix free self-hosted; AX Free 25k spans/mo; AX Pro $50/mo | ✓ | Engineering teams | Visit → |
| 3 | Braintrust | Best for evaluation-driven teams | Unlimited users and an eval-first workflow | 4.1/5 | Starter $0/mo (1 GB, 10k scores); Pro $249/mo | ✓ | AI product teams | Visit → |
| 4 | Opik (Comet) | Cheapest hosted plan with an Apache 2.0 core | Apache 2.0 core and a $19 hosted plan for 50 members | 4.1/5 | Free Cloud 25k spans/mo; Pro Cloud $19/mo billed monthly | ✓ | Startups | Visit → |
| 5 | W&B Weave | Best for teams already on Weights & Biases | LLM traces next to model training runs | 4.0/5 | Free $0/mo (1 GB Weave ingestion); Pro from $60/mo billed monthly | ✓ | ML teams | Visit → |
| 6 | Datadog LLM Observability | Best for teams already on Datadog | LLM spans linked to APM and infrastructure | 3.7/5 | Free up to 40K LLM spans/mo; Pro from $160/mo billed annually ($240 on-demand) | ✓ | Datadog customers | Visit → |
Is your tool missing from this page? Email us: hello@hackceleration.com
You're leaving LangSmith because... take this
Unlimited users on Core at $29/mo.
Traces must stay on your serversArize PhoenixFree self-hosting, no usage limits.
Evals run your release processBraintrustExperiments and scorers first.
You want the smallest billOpikPro Cloud $19/mo, 100k spans.
You also train modelsW&B WeaveTraces next to W&B experiments.
Your company runs on DatadogDatadog LLM ObservabilityLLM spans linked to APM.
How to choose a LangSmith alternative
LangSmith belongs to the LLM observability and evaluation category: tools that record what your AI app does in production and help you measure whether it does it well. They work in three layers. Tracing wraps each request in a trace, and each step inside it, a model call, a tool call, a retrieval from a vector database, becomes a span with its input, output, token count, cost and latency. Evaluation scores those traces, either with code, with a human reviewer or with another model acting as a judge, and runs experiments on a fixed dataset each time you change a prompt or a model. Monitoring turns scores, costs and errors into dashboards and alerts. For the wider field, see our LLM observability ranking and our LLM API ranking; if you are also rethinking the framework itself, read our LangChain review and our LangChain alternatives.
What to demand before you compare
Know the unit behind each price
Read the license, not the word open source
Three traps the other guides skip
Before you switch
LangSmith alternatives, your questions
Can I use LangSmith without LangChain?
Yes. LangSmith traces any code: in Python or TypeScript you wrap a function with the traceable decorator, and you can also send traces through OpenTelemetry by pointing the exporter at your LangSmith API URL with /otel added. That same endpoint makes a migration easier, since an app instrumented with OpenTelemetry can send its traces to LangSmith and to an alternative at the same time while you compare.
Is LangSmith SOC 2 and HIPAA compliant?
Yes. LangSmith states that it is SOC 2 Type 2 certified, HIPAA compliant and GDPR compliant, including on its regional instances. Among the alternatives, Langfuse sends its SOC 2 Type II report on request to Pro, Team and Enterprise customers, and Comet lists SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA and GDPR compliance on its Opik Enterprise plan, so check the plan before you count on the report.
Does LangSmith have an EU data region?
Yes. LangSmith runs regional instances on GCP in the US, the EU and APAC, plus AWS in the US, and you can sign up for a regional instance on every plan, including the free one, at the same price. Two catches: LangChain does not support moving an organization between regions, and it has no legal entity in the EU for customer contracts, so pick the region before you send your first trace.
Can I export my traces out of LangSmith?
Only on Enterprise for new accounts. Bulk export writes traces to an S3-compatible bucket in Parquet format, but customers who signed up from mid-2026 get it only on the Enterprise plan; older Plus accounts keep it until early 2027. On Developer or Plus, plan your export through the API before you cancel, or start sending traces to your next tool in parallel.
How fast does LangSmith delete a trace I need removed?
Usually within hours. LangSmith lets you delete specific traces for compliance, and most deletes are hardened within 6 hours or sooner. For a right-to-erasure request, delete the trace and record the request date, since base traces also expire on their own after 14 days.
What happens when the free LangSmith plan reaches 5,000 traces?
LangSmith stops taking traces past 5,000 that month until you add a card. Personal organizations are limited to 5,000 traces per month until a credit card is added; once a card is on file, extra traces are billed pay-as-you-go. If you only prototype, set a sampling rate in your SDK so the quota covers a full month.
How do I move LangChain tracing from LangSmith to Langfuse?
You swap the tracer for Langfuse's LangChain callback handler, which captures your chains, model calls, tools and retrievers automatically. Set your Langfuse keys as environment variables, pass the handler in the callbacks of your chain or agent, and remove the LangSmith environment variables. Prompts and datasets do not move by themselves: export them first and recreate them in Langfuse.
Is Helicone still a good LangSmith alternative?
Not for a new project. Helicone, an AI gateway with request logging that many comparison guides still list, went into maintenance mode when Mintlify bought it in 2026: security updates, bug fixes and new models, but no new features, and help to migrate elsewhere. Its site now says it is part of Experiential Labs. If you liked its proxy approach, pick a maintained gateway and send traces to Langfuse, Phoenix or Opik instead.