The best backend as a service platforms in 2026

Database, auth, storage and APIs without running servers: which BaaS fits your app.

A backend as a service (BaaS) gives your app a ready-made database, user login, file storage and APIs, so you write the front end and skip the servers. Here is the short answer.

For most web apps: Supabase, a real Postgres database, free to start and $25 a month on Pro. For a mobile app with offline mode and push: Firebase. Building with no-code tools: Xano. Want open source you can host yourself: Appwrite, or PocketBase on a single cheap server.

Romain CochardCEO of Hack'celeration
Updated 20268BaaS platforms ranked15platforms reviewed8ranked platforms with a free plan

The ranking is editorial: a sponsored spot is always labeled on its entry, and no affiliate link changes a score.

At a glance

8 backend as a service platforms compared

Read the "Model" column first: it tells you what kind of database and lock-in you are signing up for.

Best forModelFree planTeam sizeVisit
1Supabaseall-round BaaSPostgres4.3/5Free, Pro from $25/mo✓Startups, SMBsVisit →
2Firebasefor mobile appsNoSQL4.2/5Free (Spark), then pay as you go✓Mobile appsVisit →
3Xanono-code backendNo-code4.1/5Free, Essential $85/mo billed annually✓No-code teamsVisit →
4Appwriteopen source Firebase alternativeOpen source4.0/5Free, Pro $25/mo✓Self-hostersVisit →
5Convexfor realtime TypeScript appsReactive3.9/5Free, Professional $25 per developer/mo✓TS web appsVisit →
6PocketBasefree self-hosted backendSelf-hosted3.8/5Free, open source (MIT)✓Solo, side projectsVisit →
7Back4Appmanaged Parse backendParse3.6/5Free, MVP $15 per app/mo billed annually✓Parse appsVisit →
8Nhostfor GraphQLGraphQL3.5/5Free, Pro from $25/mo✓GraphQL teamsVisit →

Prices read on vendor pricing pages in 2026, in US dollars. Annual prices are marked as billed annually.

Is your tool missing from this page? Email us: hello@hackceleration.com

Our method

How we compared and scored

We started from what Google ranks for "backend as a service" in the US: definitions, open source lists and developer guides. The platforms they cite most (Supabase, Firebase, Appwrite, Nhost, Back4App and Convex) all made our list, plus Xano for no-code builders and PocketBase for self-hosting. We reviewed fifteen platforms on their official pricing, docs and terms, then read developer feedback on Reddit, Hacker News and Firebase's own feature request board.

Each platform gets five scores: developer experience, free plan, pricing at scale, features, and portability (how hard it is to leave). AWS Amplify, which several guides cite, is a hosting and front-end toolkit on top of AWS rather than one backend product, so it comes up in the guide. Backendless and 8base appear in one guide each; Clerk does authentication only; Directus is closer to a headless CMS.

15platforms reviewed
8ranked
5criteria
1
Best all-round BaaS

Supabase

4.3/5

Supabase gives you a full Postgres database per project, plus authentication, file storage, realtime subscriptions and edge functions. Because the data sits in plain Postgres, you can query it with SQL, connect any Postgres tool, and take a dump with you if you leave. Our full Supabase review goes through each plan, and the Pinecone vs Supabase comparison covers its vector search for AI apps.

The free plan allows 2 active projects, 500 MB of database per project and 50,000 monthly active users. Free projects are paused after 1 week of inactivity, which catches many people with a demo they forgot about. Pro starts at $25 a month with the first project included; each extra project adds compute from $10 a month. Spend caps are on by default on Pro, so a traffic spike cannot turn into an open-ended bill unless you switch the cap off.

The limit: Row Level Security policies are how you protect data that the browser reads directly, and writing them is the real learning curve. Skip them and your tables are exposed.

Standout features
  • Plain Postgres
  • Spend cap on by default
  • Open source, self-hostable
+Pros
  • ✓SQL and a portable database
  • ✓Auth, storage, realtime and functions in one place
  • ✓Predictable Pro pricing
−Cons
  • ✗Free projects pause after a week idle
  • ✗RLS policies take time to learn
  • ✗Two active free projects only
Verdict

The default pick for most new apps in 2026. Choose something else only for offline-first mobile (Firebase) or a reactive TypeScript app (Convex).

Explore Supabase →
2
Best for mobile apps

Firebase

4.2/5

Firebase is Google's app platform: Firestore (a NoSQL document database with offline sync on mobile), Authentication, Cloud Functions, Cloud Storage, Hosting, Crashlytics and Cloud Messaging for push notifications. Its mobile SDKs cover offline persistence and push out of the box, which is why so many iOS and Android apps start on it. If you are already thinking of leaving, our guide to switching from Firebase covers the move.

The Spark plan costs nothing and needs no payment method. Firestore on Spark includes 1 GiB stored, 50K reads and 20K writes a day; Authentication is free up to 50K monthly active users. Blaze is pay as you go, with $300 of Google Cloud credit for eligible new accounts.

The limit is the bill. Firestore charges per document read, so a badly written listener can read the same collection thousands of times. Budget alerts do not pause services; Firebase now offers spend caps that pause a service at 100% of its budget, but only for four services (AI Logic, App Hosting, Cloud Functions and Extensions), and the cut is not instant.

Standout features
  • Offline sync on mobile
  • Push notifications built in
  • No card needed on Spark
+Pros
  • ✓Mobile SDKs with offline sync
  • ✓Generous free quotas
  • ✓Huge community and tutorials
−Cons
  • ✗Per-read billing is hard to predict
  • ✗NoSQL data is harder to move
  • ✗Spend caps cover four services only
Verdict

Still the safest choice for a mobile app with offline mode and push. Set budget alerts and spend caps on day one, and model your reads before launch.

Explore Firebase →
3
Best no-code backend

Xano

4.1/5

Xano is the backend for people who don't want to write backend code. You design a Postgres database, then build API endpoints with a visual function stack: queries, conditions, loops, external API calls, authentication. Front-end builders like FlutterFlow, WeWeb or Bubble then call those APIs. Our Xano review details each plan and the Bubble vs Xano comparison explains when to split front end and backend.

The Free plan is for building: it is limited to 10 API requests per 20 seconds and up to 100K records, so it cannot carry real traffic. Essential costs $85 a month billed annually, or $99 billed monthly; Pro is $224 billed annually, or $249 monthly.

The limit: you still think like a developer (variables, loops, tokens), and the jump from free to $85 a month is steep for a side project.

Standout features
  • Visual API builder
  • Postgres underneath
  • Works with any front end
+Pros
  • ✓Real backend logic with no server code
  • ✓Fits FlutterFlow, WeWeb, Bubble
  • ✓Scales past no-code databases
−Cons
  • ✗Free plan is rate-limited
  • ✗Steep first paid plan
  • ✗Still a learning curve
Verdict

The pick when your team builds with no-code tools and has outgrown Airtable or Bubble's database. Developers will move faster with Supabase.

Explore Xano →
4
Best open source Firebase alternative

Appwrite

4.0/5

Appwrite bundles auth, databases, storage, functions, messaging and site hosting in one open source project. You can run it on Appwrite Cloud or on your own server with Docker, and its SDKs cover web, Flutter, Apple, Android and many server languages.

Free organizations are 100% free on Appwrite Cloud. At a free limit, your project freezes and the console goes read-only until you upgrade or remove resources. Pro is listed at $25 a month per organization, with usage beyond the included resources billed on top and an optional budget cap. Databases can now run on serverless compute (the default, TablesDB) or on dedicated tiers from $10 a month per database, which is where PostgreSQL and MySQL are offered.

The limit: its default database is not plain Postgres like Supabase's (Postgres means paying for a dedicated tier), and fewer third-party tutorials exist than for Firebase or Supabase.

Standout features
  • Open source, self-hostable
  • Wide SDK coverage
  • Budget cap on Pro
+Pros
  • ✓Firebase-like experience you can own
  • ✓Messaging and hosting included
  • ✓Freeze instead of a surprise bill on Free
−Cons
  • ✗Smaller ecosystem
  • ✗Postgres and MySQL on dedicated tiers
  • ✗Self-hosting means maintaining it
Verdict

The best choice if you want Firebase's comfort without being tied to Google, or if your data has to stay on your servers.

Explore Appwrite →
5
Best for realtime TypeScript apps

Convex

3.9/5

Convex is a reactive backend: you write queries and mutations as TypeScript functions, and every client subscribed to a query gets the new result as soon as the data changes. No cache to invalidate and no websocket code to write. It is popular for chat, dashboards, multiplayer tools and AI apps.

The Free & Starter plan covers 1 to 6 developers and includes 1M function calls, then $2.20 per additional million. Professional costs $25 per developer per month, and the Business plan has a $2,500 monthly minimum.

The limit: your backend logic lives in Convex's own model, so moving away means rewriting more than with a Postgres-based service.

Standout features
  • Reactive queries
  • Backend in TypeScript
  • Pay-as-you-go free tier
+Pros
  • ✓Live updates with no extra code
  • ✓Great developer experience
  • ✓Type safety end to end
−Cons
  • ✗More lock-in than Postgres
  • ✗Per-developer pricing adds up
  • ✗Less suited to mobile offline
Verdict

Pick it for a live, collaborative web app written in TypeScript. For a classic CRUD app, Supabase is simpler to leave later.

Explore Convex →
6
Best free self-hosted backend

PocketBase

3.8/5

PocketBase is an open source backend in one file: an embedded SQLite database with a schema builder, realtime subscriptions, authentication, file storage and an admin dashboard. You download it, run it on a small VPS, and you have a backend. It is under the MIT license and costs nothing beyond your server.

It scales only on a single server, vertically, which is plenty for most side projects and internal tools. The project warns that full backward compatibility is not guaranteed before reaching v1.0.0, so read the changelog before each upgrade.

The limit: it runs on one server, and you own backups, updates and security.

Standout features
  • One file to deploy
  • MIT license
  • Realtime and auth included
+Pros
  • ✓No monthly bill
  • ✓Very fast to set up
  • ✓Built-in backups, local or to S3
−Cons
  • ✗Single server only
  • ✗Breaking changes possible before v1
  • ✗You run and secure it
Verdict

A strong choice for a prototype, a side project or an internal tool. Move to Supabase or Appwrite when you need several servers.

Explore PocketBase →
7
Best managed Parse backend

Back4App

3.6/5

Back4App hosts Parse Server, the open source backend that Facebook released after closing Parse. You get a database with REST and GraphQL APIs, cloud code functions, authentication, files and push notifications, plus newer AI and MCP features. Because Parse is open source, you can move your app to your own Parse Server later.

The free plan is meant for developing, learning and prototyping: 25K requests a month, 250 MB of data storage and 1 GB of transfer. Paid plans are priced per app and per month, billed annually: MVP at $15 (500K requests), Pay As You Go at $80 (5M requests) and Dedicated at $400.

The limit: plans are capped by request counts, so a busy app climbs plans quickly, and the Parse community is smaller than in its early days.

Standout features
  • Managed Parse Server
  • REST and GraphQL
  • Exit to open source Parse
+Pros
  • ✓Low entry price
  • ✓Push and cloud code included
  • ✓Portable to self-hosted Parse
−Cons
  • ✗Request caps per plan
  • ✗Annual billing for the listed prices
  • ✗Smaller community
Verdict

A sound choice for a Parse app or a small production app on a tight budget. For new projects, compare it with Supabase first.

Explore Back4App →
8
Best for GraphQL

Nhost

3.5/5

Nhost pairs a Postgres database with Hasura, which generates a GraphQL API from your tables, and adds authentication, storage and serverless functions. If your front end is built around GraphQL, it saves you writing resolvers. Nhost is open source, so you can self-host it.

The free Starter plan allows 1 project with a 1 GB database, and the project is paused after 1 week of inactivity. Pro starts at $25 a month, with $15 of compute credits included.

The limit: if you don't want GraphQL, Supabase covers the same ground with a larger ecosystem.

Standout features
  • Instant GraphQL with Hasura
  • Postgres underneath
  • Open source
+Pros
  • ✓No resolvers to write
  • ✓Portable Postgres data
  • ✓Clear Pro price
−Cons
  • ✗One free project only
  • ✗Free projects pause after a week
  • ✗GraphQL-first
Verdict

Choose it only if your team wants GraphQL. Otherwise Supabase is the more complete Postgres backend.

Explore Nhost →
Free plans

What the free plans really allow

Each of the eight platforms has a free plan, and each stops you in its own way: a pause, a freeze, a quota or a rate limit. Know which one before you launch.

01

Paused when idle: Supabase and Nhost

Supabase pauses free projects after 1 week of inactivity, and so does Nhost. Fine for development, risky for a live demo or a client project that gets little traffic. A paused project has to be restored before it answers again.

02

Frozen at the limit: Appwrite

On Appwrite's free plan, hitting a limit freezes the project and leaves the console read-only. You never get a bill, but your app stops until you upgrade or clean up.

03

Daily quotas: Firebase Spark

Spark gives 50K Firestore reads and 20K writes a day. Go past them and requests fail until the next day, unless you move to Blaze, where every read is billed.

04

Rate limited: Xano

Xano's free plan allows 10 API requests per 20 seconds: enough to build and demo, not for real users.

05

Free forever, your server: PocketBase

PocketBase costs nothing, and a small VPS runs it. The trade-off is your time: updates, backups and security are yours.

How to choose

How to pick your backend as a service

Four questions settle most choices.

SQL or documents?

If your data has relations (users, orders, invoices), pick a Postgres backend: Supabase, Nhost or Xano. If it is mostly nested documents synced to phones, Firebase fits. Postgres data is also the easiest to take elsewhere.

Code or no-code?

Developers move fastest with Supabase, Firebase or Convex. Teams building with no-code app builders like FlutterFlow or WeWeb usually pair them with Xano or Supabase.

How will you leave?

Check the exit before you start. Supabase, Appwrite, Nhost, PocketBase and Back4App (Parse) are open source; Firebase and Convex keep your logic in their own model (Convex's backend is open source and can be self-hosted, but your code stays written for it). Our pages on Supabase alternatives and Xano alternatives list the options.

What if traffic explodes?

Look for a hard cap. Supabase Pro has a spend cap on by default, Appwrite Pro has a budget cap, Appwrite and Supabase free plans stop rather than bill. On Firebase Blaze, alerts only warn you.

Tips

Save money and avoid lock-in

Small things from docs and developer forums that the guides skip.

01

Turn on Firebase spend caps where they exist

Spend caps pause Cloud Functions, App Hosting, Extensions or AI Logic at 100% of the budget you set. They don't cover Firestore reads, so cache reads on the client and avoid listeners on whole collections.

02

Keep a cron ping on a free demo

A free Supabase or Nhost project pauses after a week idle. For a portfolio demo, a weekly request keeps it awake; for anything a client relies on, pay for Pro.

03

Write RLS policies before your first user

On Supabase, the browser talks to the database directly. Enable Row Level Security on every table and write the policies first.

04

Compare Xano annual and monthly

Xano Essential is $85 a month billed annually and $99 billed monthly: start monthly while you validate, switch to annual once the app has users.

05

Back up PocketBase with its built-in backups

PocketBase has built-in backups (Dashboard, Settings, Backups): each one is a ZIP of the whole pb_data folder, kept locally or sent to S3-compatible storage. Copying pb_data by hand also works, but only with the app stopped, for transactional safety. Test a restore once.

Go further

Related comparisons

FAQ · 6 questions

Backend as a service · FAQ

  • What is an example of backend as a service?

    Firebase and Supabase are two common examples. Both give you a database, user authentication, file storage and server functions through an SDK, so your app talks to them instead of to servers you run.

  • What is the difference between BaaS and serverless?

    Serverless runs your own code without managing servers; BaaS hands you finished building blocks (database, auth, storage). Most BaaS platforms include serverless functions for the custom logic the blocks don't cover.

  • Is BaaS the same as PaaS?

    No. A PaaS hosts the backend you write, in your framework; a BaaS is the backend, already written. PaaS gives more control, BaaS ships faster.

  • Is Supabase better than Firebase?

    For a web app with relational data, usually yes: Postgres, SQL and a spend cap on Pro. For a mobile app that needs offline sync and push notifications, Firebase is still ahead.

  • Can I self-host a backend as a service?

    Yes. Supabase, Appwrite, Nhost and Parse Server can run on your servers, and PocketBase is built for it: one file on a single machine. You trade the monthly bill for maintenance work.

  • When should you stop using a BaaS?

    When your logic outgrows its functions, or costs grow faster than usage. Teams usually move heavy jobs to their own services first and keep the BaaS for auth and data, which is easiest when the database is Postgres.

Hack'celeration Lab

Get our next rankings in your inbox

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.