FullEnrich Review 2026
FullEnrich is worth it if you need B2B mobile numbers and work emails for lists you already have, and you'd rather pay one bill than stack three data contracts. It runs a waterfall across 20+ providers and only charges credits when it finds verified data. Pricing starts at $29/month for 500 credits ($26 billed annually). There's no free plan, just a 50-credit trial. It's a weaker fit if you also want to send sequences, if most of your targets are in the US and you need near-perfect phone accuracy, or if you might cancel mid-term: unused subscription credits expire when you do.
We compared FullEnrich with Apollo, Clay, Lusha, BetterContact and ZoomInfo on five criteria, went through the full pricing grid, the terms of service and the help center, and read what both customers and enriched people say about it. Below you'll find what most reviews skip: the real cost per mobile at each tier, what happens to credits when you cancel, bounce rates by email status, and why the public rating drops to 2.1 out of 5 on a consumer review site.
Our FullEnrich review in a nutshell
FullEnrich does one job: finding a prospect's work email and mobile number. You give it a name and a company, or a LinkedIn profile URL. It then queries 20+ data providers in sequence (Hunter, ContactOut, Snov, Wiza, Anymail Finder and others) until one returns something, and verifies the result before handing it back. That's waterfall enrichment. You only pay for what's found, and an invalid email costs nothing.
The catch is credit management. A mobile number costs 10 credits, so the $29 entry tier gets you 50 mobiles at most. Unused credits roll over for 3 months on monthly plans, but expire if you cancel. Reviews show a split picture: around 4.8 out of 5 from 200+ customers on a major software review site, and 2.1 out of 5 on a consumer review site, where most posts come from people whose number was found without their consent.
Our verdict: 3.9 out of 5. Pick FullEnrich if your team calls and emails prospects from lists you already own, especially across Europe and the US. Pick Apollo if you want the database and the sending tool in one place, and Clay if you want to design the whole enrichment flow yourself.
The numbers speak. Want to try FullEnrich?
What FullEnrich costs, tier by tier
FullEnrich has a single paid plan, Pro, priced by how many credits you buy each month: 11 tiers from 500 to 100,000 credits. The cards below show the most useful ones, annual price first, monthly underneath.
The credit rates matter more than the sticker price: 1 credit for a work email, 3 for a personal email, 10 for a mobile number. Person and company data come free with an enrichment, or cost 0.25 credits on their own.
USD per month, billed annually (monthly price underneath)
Trial
To measure hit rates on your own list
No credit card
- Every Pro feature
- That's 50 work emails, or 5 mobiles
- Bonus credits for inviting teammates
- Unlimited users
- Not a permanent free plan
Pro 500
For a solo founder doing light outreach
$29 monthly
- 500 credits a month
- 50 mobiles max, or 500 emails
- About $0.58 per mobile on monthly
- Rollover: 3 months monthly, 12 months annual
Pro 1,000
For one SDR making calls every week
$55 monthly
- 1,000 credits a month
- 100 mobiles, or any email and mobile mix
- About $0.55 per mobile on monthly
- Unlimited users
Pro 5,000
For a small sales team
$255 monthly
- 5,000 credits a month
- About $0.051 per credit on monthly
- Search across 800M people and 50M companies
- API, HubSpot, Clay, Zapier, Make, n8n
Pro 15,000
FullEnrich's own example: 10 reps
$720 monthly
- 10 reps × 20 mobiles and 100 emails a week
- Roughly 12,000 credits a month
- The official calculator lands on this tier
- Above 100,000 credits: custom quote
Enterprise
For high volume and RevOps-heavy teams
Above 100,000 credits a month
- Priority support and a dedicated account manager
- Custom API rate limits
- Bring your own provider keys (BYOK)
- Per-user credit caps and alerts
- Custom SSO as a paid add-on
Official FullEnrich pricing grid, checked in 2026. Annual billing is roughly 10% cheaper than monthly. Credits are never charged for an invalid email or a lookup that finds nothing.
What real users say about FullEnrich
- 5★8
- 4★1
- 3★0
- 2★0
- 1★0
Across these 9 G2 reviews, FullEnrich averages 4.9 out of 5 and every reviewer would recommend it. The praise is consistent: the multi-provider waterfall finds accurate emails and hard-to-reach phone numbers, and an empty lookup costs nothing. Reviewers also single out the speed (200 to 300 profiles enriched from a one-column LinkedIn URL file in about five minutes), the Google sign-up, credit rollover, and the API, MCP and Clay integrations. The complaints are just as clear: credits burn fast on large lists, the price feels a bit high, remaining credits are lost on cancellation and plans can't be paused (David S.), data can be incomplete for niche contacts or small companies, and there's no direct extraction from LinkedIn or Sales Navigator. Worth weighing: these strong customer ratings contrast with a low Trustpilot score, where individuals complain about finding their contact details there or being cold-contacted without asking for it.
Most loved
- +The provider waterfall returns accurate emails and hard-to-reach mobiles
- +Empty lookups never cost credits
- +Unused credits roll over from month to month
- +200 to 300 LinkedIn profiles enriched in about five minutes
- +API, MCP and Clay integrations, plus easy Google sign-up
Watch-outs
- !Credits burn fast on large lists, and the price feels a bit high
- !Remaining credits lost on cancellation, no way to pause
- !Data can be incomplete for niche contacts or small companies
- !No direct extraction from LinkedIn or Sales Navigator
- !Individuals on Trustpilot complain their contact details are circulating
- David S. via G2
The enrichment feature is fabulous. I haven't had the chance to use it for anything else like the hunting feature yet. I tried using it for my market and unfortunately I didn't find much useful information, so I'll have to try again. Occasionally it doesn't return the contacts I'm looking for, but it never charges me for the credits. I'm also unhappy about losing ALL my credits if I cancel, when I'm paying for this out of my own pocket and just want a financial break. That upset me, and when I tried to pause it, I couldn't even access it or use my credits AT ALL. That's a very bad business practice.
- Soheil S. via G2
Very useful for finding email addresses and phone numbers, especially using a waterfall cadence that taps the best providers for each region. It automatically picks whether the best provider is for European or US data, and handles that on its own. I don't need to configure the waterfall myself. I appreciate its MCP and its API, which make it easy to use with Claude Code, Clay and other tools. Nothing comes to mind on the downside.
- Verified User in Computer Software via G2
I used FullEnrich for lead enrichment, and the data quality stayed consistently high. The email addresses and phone numbers are generally accurate. I like the waterfall approach, because it draws on multiple sources and helps lift match rates. A reliable tool for prospecting. The biggest downside for me is that credits can run out quickly when I process large lists, and the price feels a bit high. Still, the data quality is consistently good, which justifies the cost.
- anthony a. via G2
J'apprécie la rapidité de recherche de FullEnrich, qui permet de traiter en à peine 5 minutes une base de 200 à 300 profils avec une conversion très intéressante d'environ 60 à 70 %. Une coordonnée directe est un sacré plus et confort durant la prospection même si ce n'est pas une garantie de conversion commerciale. La simplicité d'utilisation est aussi un avantage avec la possibilité d'alimenter le fichier à enrichir à partir d'un simple fichier CSV ou Excel d'une seule colonne avec les URL de profil LinkedIn. L'installation initiale a été très simple grâce à une connexion via le profil Google. Rien de particulier à reprocher, même si l'extraction directe des recherches de LinkedIn ou Sales Navigator serait top plutôt que de devoir passer par des Waalaxy ou PhantomBuster, mais je pense que cela tient plus de LinkedIn que de FullEnrich.
- Dave M. via G2
FullEnrich uses multiple data sources and seems to do a better job than the other tools we bought in the past (LeadIQ, Hunter). Credits roll over from month to month, so if you have a big job after not using the service for a while, all those unused credits are still available. The web interface is good, but not great. When you paste a single contact, the nearby button says 'add a contact' when it should say 'enrich the contact'. That's a pretty minor complaint.
- Christopher C. via G2
It works as advertised. The interface is easy to use, and the new search feature is particularly helpful. It significantly cuts the time it takes me to go from identifying a prospect to talking with them. The processing time needed to get a phone number can sometimes take a minute, but that's a million times faster than not having the number at all!
We compared FullEnrich on five criteria.
One score per criterion, against Apollo, Clay, Lusha and BetterContact, with the wins and the catches.
Is FullEnrich easy to pick up?
Yes, it's one of the easiest enrichment tools out there. You sign up with Google, then work in one of three ways: upload a CSV exported from your CRM or Sales Navigator, paste a list of LinkedIn profile URLs, or build a list in the built-in prospect search. Each row gets a status (email found, mobile found, nothing found), and you export the file or push it to HubSpot.
There's almost nothing to configure. Unlike Clay, where you design the provider order yourself, the waterfall comes pre-built. You can pick which providers to query, but you don't have to. One G2 reviewer describes enriching 200 to 300 profiles from a one-column CSV of LinkedIn URLs in about five minutes.
The big change is the Chrome extension. It used to reveal an email or mobile in one click while you browsed LinkedIn, and FullEnrich retired it in 2025. Several G2 reviewers call its absence the main inconvenience. You now paste the profile URL into the app, upload a file, or go through the API. If your reps prospect profile by profile, Lusha or Apollo, which still ship extensions, will feel smoother.
One more trap: the credit cost isn't shown when you launch a mobile lookup, and that's where new users burn their trial. Fifty credits buys five mobiles. Run your first list as email-only, then request mobiles for the accounts that matter.
Fast and simple for list enrichment. Less handy for one-off lookups since the extension went away.
What does FullEnrich really cost you?
Cheap for emails, fair for mobiles. The entry tier is $29/month for 500 credits, or $26 billed annually. Plenty of reviews quote $55/month, but that's the 1,000-credit tier, not the floor. The grid tops out at $3,500/month for 100,000 credits, and the per-credit price drops from $0.058 to $0.035 on monthly billing.
The number to watch is cost per mobile. At 10 credits each, a mobile works out to about $0.58 on the entry tier, $0.55 at 1,000 credits and $0.35 at the top tier. Work emails cost a tenth of that. The model is fair where it counts: invalid emails cost nothing, and landlines it finds aren't billed as mobiles.
The real trap is unused credits. They roll over for 3 months on monthly plans and 12 months on annual. But cancel, and the remaining subscription credits expire at the end of the billing period. The terms add that credits are non-refundable, and deleting your workspace wipes them. One G2 reviewer calls this out directly, and the help center confirms it.
Against the competition, FullEnrich sits in the middle. BetterContact starts lower, at $15/month for 200 credits, with the same 10 credits per mobile. Lusha starts at $49.90 per user per month, so a five-rep team pays five times. Clay starts at $185/month and does far more than enrichment. For the head-to-head, read FullEnrich vs BetterContact.
Good value for emails, fair for mobiles, as long as you actually spend your credits. Don't commit to a big monthly tier if your outreach is lumpy.
What can FullEnrich actually do?
Find and verify contact data, very well. Everything else, barely. The core is the waterfall: FullEnrich has no email or phone database of its own. It calls 20+ providers in turn and stops at the first result that passes verification. FullEnrich claims a find rate around 80%, with regional differences. That's the vendor's number, so measure it on your own list during the trial.
Email verification is where it shines. Three methods run back to back, and FullEnrich says it filters out up to 32% of bad emails returned by providers. It also publishes something rare: bounce rates by status. A "valid" email bounces 1 to 2% of the time, a "probably valid" one about 9%. A catch-all bounces 26 to 40% of the time. A catch-all is a domain that accepts every message, so nobody can confirm the mailbox exists. Keep that in mind: the under-1% bounce claim on the homepage only applies to valid emails.
On phones, FullEnrich flags landlines and removes disconnected numbers. Owner-name verification only covers the US and Canada. That lines up with the most common G2 complaint: wrong numbers, or numbers that reach the wrong person, with one reviewer finding US data weaker than UK and European data. If you dial mostly into the US, test hard before you scale.
Prospect search adds a database of 800 million people and 50 million companies with 30+ filters. It's for building a list, not replacing Apollo: that database holds no emails or phones, so you still enrich afterwards. What's missing: sequences, sending and tracking. FullEnrich stops at the data.
A strong waterfall with unusually transparent verification. You'll still need a separate tool to send.
Sold on the details? Start a FullEnrich trial.
Can you count on FullEnrich support?
As a customer, yes. Support runs on chat and email, and reviews regularly praise how fast it answers. One support agent gets thanked by name across several public reviews, which tells you it's a small team that knows the product. The help center is clear, and the API docs spell out limits, error codes and examples. Enterprise adds priority support and a dedicated account manager.
The company itself is young. Benjamin Douablin and Andrew Patel founded it in Paris in 2024, it raised about $2M in seed funding in 2025, and it's now based in San Francisco under Delaware law with JAMS arbitration in the terms.
The weak spot is public reputation. On a consumer review site, FullEnrich sits at 2.1 out of 5 across 22 reviews, 86% of them one star. Most come from enriched people, not customers: personal mobiles being resold, calls despite registration on the UK Telephone Preference Service, access and deletion requests left unanswered, a broken opt-out link. FullEnrich doesn't reply to those negative reviews. For you as a buyer the risk is indirect, but real: if you call UK numbers, screen them against the TPS yourself, because the complaint lands on your company, not on FullEnrich.
Responsive support for paying customers. Handling complaints from enriched people is where the vendor falls short.
Does FullEnrich plug into your stack?
Yes, it's one of its strongest points. The HubSpot integration pushes enriched contacts into your CRM, or enriches the ones already there. Inside Clay, FullEnrich works as one provider in a bigger waterfall. For everything else there are modules for Zapier, Make and n8n.
The API is fast. It allows 60 calls per minute with batches of 100 contacts, so roughly 6,000 contacts per minute, and up to 100 enrichments running in parallel. FullEnrich recommends webhooks (a URL that receives the result when it's ready) instead of polling. Endpoints cover enrichment, search and reverse email lookup.
There's also an MCP server, a connector that lets Claude, ChatGPT or Perplexity run a search or an enrichment from a chat. Handy for ten prospects on the fly, less so for thousands.
What's missing: a native push to a sequencer like lemlist. You'll go through a CSV or an automation. Some articles mention Salesforce or Pipedrive, but the official pricing page doesn't list them, so check before you rely on it.
HubSpot, Clay, the API and MCP cover most teams. For Salesforce or your sequencer, plan an automation.
FullEnrich without nasty surprises
Most disappointments come from credits draining faster than planned, or emails bouncing. Here are six settings and traps to know before you pay.
Spend the trial on emails, in your own region
Before you payThe trial gives you 50 credits with no card. Spend them on mobiles and you'll see five results, which tells you nothing. Run 50 work emails on a sample of your real target list instead, then count how many come back valid, probably valid or catch-all.
Pick a sample that matches your outreach: one G2 reviewer found UK and European data more accurate than US data. And invite your teammates during the trial, since each invite earns extra credits.
- Trial
- 50 credits
- Credit card
- Not required
- Bonus
- Credits per invited teammate
Downgrade instead of cancelling
Big savingWhen you cancel, remaining subscription credits expire at the end of the period. If you still have a stock, switch to the 500-credit tier from the billing page instead. You keep paying $29/month, but you keep access to your rolled-over credits.
If you do cancel, time it right before renewal: cancellation takes effect on the last day of the month on monthly plans, or of the commitment year on annual.
- Monthly rollover
- 3 months
- Annual rollover
- 12 months
- On cancellation
- Credits expire
Go annual only if your volume is steady
Annual billing is about 10% cheaper: $26 instead of $29 at 500 credits, $49 instead of $55 at 1,000. The bigger perk is the 12-month rollover instead of 3. If your outreach swings between busy and quiet months, that rollover is worth more than the discount.
Annual plans aren't refundable, though. If enrichment is new to you, start monthly on the smallest tier.
- 500 credits
- $26 instead of $29
- 1,000 credits
- $49 instead of $55
- Discount
- About 10%
Send catch-alls from a secondary domain
DeliverabilityA catch-all email bounces 26 to 40% of the time, by FullEnrich's own numbers. The official advice is to send them from a secondary domain, a sending address separate from your main domain, to protect your sender reputation.
Second piece of official advice: don't re-run FullEnrich emails through another verifier. Basic verifiers misclassify catch-alls and will make you throw away addresses that work.
- Valid
- 1 to 2% bounce
- Probably valid
- About 9%
- Catch-all
- 26 to 40%
Save mobiles for your best accounts
A mobile costs ten times more than a work email. Enrich the whole list for emails first, score it, then run mobiles on the top third. On a 1,000-credit tier that turns 100 mobiles into 500 emails plus 50 mobiles.
Skip personal emails too, at 3 credits each, unless your targets have no work address.
- Work email
- 1 credit
- Personal email
- 3 credits
- Mobile
- 10 credits
Sort out compliance before you dial
ComplianceFor enrichment, FullEnrich acts as a data processor and you're the controller. Sign its data processing agreement, document your legal basis for European contacts, and give every prospect an easy way to opt out.
Calling UK mobiles? Screen them against the Telephone Preference Service first. The public complaints against FullEnrich are mostly about unwanted calls.
- FullEnrich's role
- Processor
- Your role
- Controller
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA
Six tools worth a look
FullEnrich isn't right for everyone. Each of these six tools beats it on one specific point, and each card says where it falls short.
Apollo: database and sequences in one tool
All-in-oneApollo bundles a contact database, enrichment and email sequences. It has a free plan with no time limit, then Basic costs $49 per seat per month billed annually. For a small team that wants everything in one place, it's simpler than FullEnrich plus a sequencer.
Its limit: one database, so fewer hits than a waterfall on hard-to-find profiles. See FullEnrich vs Apollo for the details.
- Price
- Free, then $49 per seat
- Best for
- Small all-in-one teams
- Limit
- Single data source
BetterContact: same waterfall, cheaper entry
BudgetBetterContact works like FullEnrich: a provider waterfall, with credits charged only on success. It starts at $15/month for 200 credits, and Pro costs $49 for 1,000 credits. A mobile is also 10 credits, and annual billing gives two months free.
Its limit: rollover is capped at twice your plan. Read FullEnrich vs BetterContact to compare.
- Price
- From $15/month
- Best for
- Low volumes
- Limit
- Capped rollover
Clay: build your own waterfall
CustomClay is a spreadsheet that queries dozens of sources, FullEnrich included, and lets AI write messages row by row. You set the provider order, the conditions and the rules. Launch costs $185/month, or $167 billed annually.
Its limit: it takes hours to master, and it's overkill if you only need enrichment. See FullEnrich vs Clay.
- Price
- From $167/month
- Best for
- RevOps teams automating everything
- Limit
- Steep learning curve
Lusha: one database, billed per user
Single sourceLusha sells access to its own contact database rather than querying several providers. Starter costs $49.90 per user per month and Pro $69.90. For a team that wants one vendor and a predictable bill per rep, it reads more clearly than a credit system.
Its limit: one source, and a price that climbs with every rep. Compare in FullEnrich vs Lusha.
- Price
- From $49.90 per user
- Best for
- Classic sales teams
- Limit
- Single data source
ZoomInfo: for enterprise sales teams
EnterpriseZoomInfo is the heavyweight: a large proprietary database with company data, intent signals and org charts, sold on annual contracts. For a large US sales org that wants one platform for research and contact data, it covers more ground than FullEnrich.
Its limit: no public pricing and long commitments, far from FullEnrich's $29 entry. See FullEnrich vs ZoomInfo.
- Price
- Custom quote
- Best for
- Large US sales teams
- Limit
- Annual contracts
Dropcontact: emails only, built in France
Emails onlyDropcontact finds and verifies work emails and cleans your CRM, without looking for phone numbers. It's a French vendor with a GDPR-first approach. Starter costs €79/month and Growth €120, with 20% off annually.
Its limit: no mobiles, and rollover only on Growth. Compare in FullEnrich vs Dropcontact.
- Price
- From €79/month
- Best for
- EU teams, emails only
- Limit
- No mobiles
Do you make a tool in this category? Email us: hello@hackceleration.com
Is FullEnrich right for you?
Three profiles, three answers. Then the checklist to run before you pull out the card.
Yes, if your reps pick up the phone
If your outreach relies on calls and you start from existing lists (LinkedIn exports, event lists, your CRM), FullEnrich finds more mobiles than a single-database tool. Start at 1,000 credits per rep and pair it with a sequencer. If you'd rather have the whole flow built for you, from LinkedIn to your CRM, our FullEnrich agency can set it up.
Think twice if you mostly dial the US
Wrong numbers are the most common complaint on G2, and one reviewer found US data weaker than European data. Owner-name verification exists for the US and Canada, which helps. Still, spend 100 credits (ten mobiles) on your actual US accounts and count connects before you buy a big tier.
Think twice if you only need emails
For emails alone you're paying for a waterfall you'll only half use. BetterContact is cheaper to start, and Apollo throws in sequences. FullEnrich still makes sense if your targets are spread across several countries.
- You measured the find rate on 50 emails from your real target list during the trial
- You did the credit math: 1 per work email, 10 per mobile
- You know remaining credits expire when you cancel
- You have a sequencer and a secondary domain for catch-alls
- You screen UK numbers against the TPS before calling
- You signed the data processing agreement for EU contacts
What are you actually here for?
Tools that beat it on a specific point, and who each one suits.
You just want to know what it costsFullEnrich pricingEvery credit tier and the real cost of a mobile.
You're torn between FullEnrich and ApolloFullEnrich vs ApolloWaterfall enrichment or an all-in-one database.
You're torn between FullEnrich and ClayFullEnrich vs ClayA ready-made waterfall or one you build yourself.
You'd rather have it set up for youFullEnrich agencyWhat we build on FullEnrich, and how long it takes.
You'd rather learn to run it yourselfFullEnrich trainingAn expert opens FullEnrich with you and works on your real case.
Frequently asked questions
How much does FullEnrich cost?
FullEnrich costs $29/month for 500 credits, or $26/month billed annually. The next common tier, 1,000 credits, is $55 monthly or $49 annually. The grid goes up to $3,500/month for 100,000 credits, then switches to a custom Enterprise quote. Every tier includes unlimited users, so you never pay per seat.Is there a FullEnrich free plan?
No, there's no permanent free plan, only a 50-credit trial with no credit card. The trial unlocks every Pro feature. You earn extra credits for each teammate you invite during the trial. After that, the cheapest paid tier is 500 credits for $29/month.How many credits does a mobile number cost?
A mobile number costs 10 credits, versus 1 for a work email and 3 for a personal email. In dollars, that's about $0.58 per mobile on the entry tier and $0.35 on the largest. If FullEnrich finds nothing, or only a landline, you aren't charged for a mobile.Are FullEnrich phone numbers accurate in the US?
Mostly, but US numbers draw the most complaints. Wrong numbers are the most frequent criticism on G2, and one reviewer found US data less accurate than UK and European data. FullEnrich verifies the owner's name for US and Canadian numbers and removes disconnected lines. Test a sample of your real US accounts before committing to a large tier.What happens to unused credits when I cancel?
Remaining subscription credits expire at the end of your billing period. Your data stays stored and restorable unless the account is inactive for more than 3 months. Credits are non-refundable under the terms. To keep your stock, downgrade to the smallest tier instead of cancelling.Does FullEnrich have a Chrome extension?
Not anymore: the LinkedIn Chrome extension was retired in 2025. You now paste a profile URL into the app, upload a CSV of profiles, or go through the API, Clay or the MCP server. If one-click lookups on LinkedIn are central to your workflow, Lusha or Apollo still offer extensions.Is FullEnrich GDPR and SOC 2 compliant?
FullEnrich states it's SOC 2 Type II certified, with the report available on request, and compliant with GDPR and CCPA. For enrichment it acts as a processor, so your company is the controller and owns the legal basis. Transfers out of the EU rely on standard contractual clauses. It's a US company with no announced EU hosting.FullEnrich or Apollo: which should you pick?
FullEnrich if you already have lists and need the highest hit rate on mobiles, Apollo if you want a database and sequences in one tool. Apollo has a free plan and Basic at $49 per seat per month billed annually. FullEnrich bills by credits with unlimited users, which suits teams with many occasional users. Some teams run both: Apollo to build lists and send, FullEnrich to fill the gaps.
Get our next tool comparisons in your inbox
One email when we publish a new tool comparison: real prices, limits and a clear verdict.