Mavenlink Alternatives

Six PSA and resourcing tools to replace Mavenlink, now Kantata.

Short answer: Productive is the closest Mavenlink replacement for agencies and consultancies, with projects, time, budgets and invoicing in one tool, and plans from $10 per user a month billed yearly (3 seats minimum). Runn is the pick if you mostly used Mavenlink for resourcing, Teamwork.com if you want a free plan to start, Rocketlane for customer onboarding projects, BigTime for hourly billing and Scoro for a quote-to-invoice suite. Mavenlink is now Kantata, which publishes no prices; every alternative here does, at least for its entry plan.

Romain CochardCEO of Hack'celeration
Updated 20266alternatives compared5criteria each2026prices read on pricing pages

The ranking is editorial: a sponsored placement is always labeled on its card, and no affiliate link changes a score.

The honest take

Why teams look past Mavenlink

Mavenlink no longer exists under that name. Mavenlink merged with Kimble Applications to create Kantata Professional Services Automation: the old Mavenlink product is now Kantata OX, and Kimble is Kantata SX, built on Salesforce. Kantata is a full PSA (professional services automation: the software that runs a services firm's projects, people, time and money), sold to firms of all sizes but priced through a conversation. Most teams who search for Mavenlink alternatives are not leaving a bad product. They are leaving a product that grew bigger than their needs. Here are the reasons we see most, each with the fact behind it.

If you are choosing a PSA for the first time, our PSA software for agencies starts one step earlier.

No public price

Kantata's pricing page shows no plan and no amount: it says it tailors plans based on company size, goals and the way your team works, and asks you to fill out a form for a PSA advisor. Every alternative ranked here publishes at least its entry price, from $7 per resource seat at Runn (billed yearly) to $49 per team member at Rocketlane.

The product changed under the name

Mavenlink customers now run Kantata OX, next to Kantata SX for firms on Salesforce. A merger means roadmaps, support teams and sales contacts change, and the renewal is often the first time a customer meets the new pricing. That renewal is when most teams start comparing.

A steep learning curve

Reviews written in 2026 keep coming back to it: a steep learning curve at first, configuration and reporting logic that need internal owners or dedicated admins, and a tool that feels heavy and expensive for smaller teams with simple workflows. For a 15-person agency, a tool that needs a dedicated administrator costs more than its licence.

Reports that need configuring

Users in 2026 describe rigid custom reporting setups, slow load times on heavy scheduling timelines, and dashboards that take extra configuration to answer simple questions such as forecast against actuals or utilization by team. When a small field change can break a report, the numbers end up in spreadsheets.

Built for the top of the market

Kantata now sells AI agents, Salesforce-native editions and over 1,200 prebuilt connectors to firms with complex operations. A small consultancy pays, in price and setup, for depth it does not open. Productive, Teamwork.com and Runn let it start with a public plan and a free trial instead.
1
Best all-in-one Mavenlink replacement

Productive

4.1/5

Productive is a professional services automation (PSA) platform built for agencies: projects, time tracking, resource planning, budgets, invoicing and profitability reports in one tool. It is the closest match to what Mavenlink covered before it became Kantata, at a size and price a smaller firm can read on the pricing page. Essential costs $10 per user a month billed yearly, or $12 billed monthly. Professional costs $25 per user a month billed yearly, or $29 billed monthly, and adds rate cards, advanced reports, billable time approvals and the invoicing integrations. Ultimate is priced on request. All plans require at least 3 seats, and there is a 14-day free trial with no credit card required.

One detail changes the budget: the invoicing integrations, which send invoices to Xero, QuickBooks Online, Exact, e-conomic, Fortnox or Twinfield and sync payments back, are listed under Professional, so a firm that wants its accounting connected should budget $25 a seat, not $10. Paying by wire transfer also needs an annual plan of at least 10 seats.

Against Mavenlink, the difference starts before you sign: Kantata does not publish prices and tailors each plan through a sales conversation, while a 10-person team can compute Productive Professional at $250 a month on yearly billing before booking a demo. Productive's limits show at the top of the market: it is not built on Salesforce like Kantata SX, and firms with thousands of consultants across many legal entities will find Kantata's financial depth hard to match. For a wider field, our PSA software for agencies ranking compares Productive with the rest of the category, and our Productive alternatives guide shows why some teams later leave it.

Standout features
  • Essential $10, Professional $25 per user a month billed yearly
  • Monthly billing: $12 and $29
  • Budgets, rate cards and profitability reports
  • 14-day trial, no card; 3-seat minimum
+Pros
  • ✓Public per-user prices you can budget before a demo
  • ✓Projects, time, resourcing and invoicing in one tool
  • ✓Profitability per project and per client
−Cons
  • ✗Not built on Salesforce, unlike Kantata SX
  • ✗Ultimate, with the advanced controls, is quote-only
  • ✗Accounting sync needs Professional ($25)
Productive vs Mavenlink (Kantata)
CriterionProductiveMavenlink (Kantata)
Published priceYes, from $10/user/mo yearlyNo, tailored quote
Free trial14 days, no cardDemo request
Budgets and invoicingIncludedIncluded
Salesforce-native optionNoYes (Kantata SX)
Verdict

Pick Productive when you are an agency or consultancy that needs Mavenlink's full scope at a price you can read. Choose Runn if you only used Mavenlink for resourcing, and stay on Kantata if you run on Salesforce with hundreds of consultants.

See Productive plans →
2
Best for resource and capacity planning

Runn

4.1/5

Runn is resource management software: it shows each person's capacity, availability and bookings against projects, and forecasts demand, utilization and project financials. It does not try to be a full PSA with invoicing. Lite costs $7 per resource seat a month and Standard $11, both billed yearly ($9 and $13 billed monthly); at 50 resources on yearly billing, that is $350 or $550 a month. Advanced is priced through sales. There is a 30-day free trial of Standard, with no credit card required.

Two limits the price cards do not show: plans start at 20 resource seats, so Lite costs at least $140 a month on yearly billing, and only Standard can be bought on your own; for Lite or Advanced you go through Runn's team. Timesheets are a Standard feature, not a Lite one, so a firm that wants actuals against plan should compare at $11.

The unit to understand is the resource seat: Runn bills for the people you schedule, not for the people who log in. A 50-person consultancy pays for 50 resources whether 3 planners or 30 managers use the tool. Against Mavenlink, that makes resourcing cheap to separate from the rest: many firms keep invoicing in their accounting software and use Runn for the part of Mavenlink they actually opened every day. What you lose is time-to-invoice in one system, which Productive or BigTime keep. Our resource planning software ranking puts Runn next to the other schedulers.

Standout features
  • Billed per resource seat: people scheduled, not logins
  • Lite $7, Standard $11 per resource a month, 20 seats minimum
  • 30-day free trial of Standard
  • Capacity, availability and forecasting
+Pros
  • ✓Capacity, availability and utilization charts on every plan
  • ✓30-day trial without a card
  • ✓Cheap per head for a resourcing-only need
−Cons
  • ✗No invoicing: you keep an accounting tool next to it
  • ✗20-seat minimum; Lite and Advanced go through sales
  • ✗Not a project delivery tool for clients
Runn vs Mavenlink (Kantata)
CriterionRunnMavenlink (Kantata)
Published price$7 per resource seat/mo (Lite), billed yearlyNo, tailored quote
What you pay forPeople scheduledSet in the quote
InvoicingNoYes
Free trial30 daysDemo request
Verdict

Pick Runn when resourcing is the reason you bought Mavenlink and your invoicing already lives elsewhere. Choose Productive or BigTime if you need time, budgets and invoices in the same place.

See Runn plans →
3
Best for client work with a free plan to start

Teamwork.com

4.0/5

Teamwork.com is project management built for client work: projects organized by client, time tracking, budgets, workload and capacity, with task, list, board, Gantt and table views. The Free plan manages up to 5 projects with 5 users. Basics costs $9.99 per user a month billed yearly, with 3 users minimum; Accelerate costs $24.99 per user a month billed yearly, with 5 users minimum, and adds workload planning, time budgets and retainers, invoices created from logged time and the QuickBooks and Xero integrations. Optimize and Enterprise are priced through sales. Paid plans have a 14-day free trial with no credit card required.

Read the prices as yearly: annual billing is shown first and saves 29%, so monthly billing costs more per seat. Against Mavenlink, Teamwork.com trades financial depth for speed of adoption: it is easier to roll out to a whole agency, and a team can start on the free plan before committing. The plan matters more than the logo here: Basics has no timesheets and no invoicing, and profit by project or client, multi-currency budgets and the Salesforce connector start at Optimize, which is sold through a demo. If you are leaving Teamwork.com later, our Teamwork.com alternatives guide covers the exit.

Standout features
  • Free plan: up to 5 projects with 5 users
  • Basics $9.99, Accelerate $24.99 per user a month yearly
  • Basics 3 users minimum, Accelerate 5
  • Work organized by client
+Pros
  • ✓A free plan to test with a real team
  • ✓Easy to roll out to people who are not project managers
  • ✓Invoices from logged time on Accelerate
−Cons
  • ✗Prices shown are yearly; monthly costs more
  • ✗Profit by client and multi-currency only on Optimize (sales)
  • ✗Top plans are quote-only
Teamwork.com vs Mavenlink (Kantata)
CriterionTeamwork.comMavenlink (Kantata)
Published priceYes, from $9.99/user/mo yearlyNo, tailored quote
Free plan5 projects, 5 usersNo
Organize by clientYesYes
Profit by project or clientOptimize plan, through salesFinancial Management module
Verdict

Pick Teamwork.com when adoption by the whole team matters more than finance depth. Choose Productive or Scoro if budgets and invoices are the core of what you used Mavenlink for.

See Teamwork.com plans →
4
Best for client onboarding and implementation projects

Rocketlane

3.9/5

Rocketlane is a professional services platform focused on customer onboarding and implementation: project plans shared with the client in a branded portal, time tracking and timesheets on Standard, then resource management and services financials (rate cards, budgets, invoicing, revenue recognition) on Premium. It suits the SaaS and IT services teams that used Mavenlink to run implementation projects for their customers. The Standard plan costs $49 per team member a month billed annually, with a minimum of 5 team members; Premium costs $69 per team member a month billed annually, also with a minimum of 5. Higher tiers go through sales. There is a 14-day free trial.

Do the math with the minimum: 5 team members on Standard cost at least $245 a month, or $2,940 a year, even if only 3 people use it. A Mavenlink user who needs resourcing and invoicing should price Premium: 5 members at $69 is $345 a month, or $4,140 a year, and implementation packages are charged on top of every plan. Against Mavenlink, Rocketlane is built around the customer: the client sees progress, tasks and documents in its own portal. It is less suited to an agency that bills creative work by the hour.

Standout features
  • Standard $49 per team member a month, billed annually
  • Resourcing and financials start on Premium, $69
  • Client portal for onboarding projects
  • 14-day trial
+Pros
  • ✓Client portal built into every project
  • ✓Strong for SaaS implementation teams
  • ✓Clear published price for its main plans
−Cons
  • ✗$245 a month minimum because of 5 seats
  • ✗Implementation packages charged on top
  • ✗Less suited to agencies billing by the hour
Rocketlane vs Mavenlink (Kantata)
CriterionRocketlaneMavenlink (Kantata)
Published price$49/team member/mo yearlyNo, tailored quote
Minimum seats5Set in the quote
Client portalBuilt in, unlimited customer membersTeam collaboration module
Resourcing and invoicingPremium plan ($69)Included in the platform
Verdict

Pick Rocketlane when your services work is onboarding customers onto software. Choose Productive or Teamwork.com if you are an agency billing client work, where the portal matters less than time and budgets.

See Rocketlane plans →
5
Best for time, billing and project accounting

BigTime

3.8/5

BigTime is a PSA built around billable time: every plan includes time tracking, invoicing, expense management and payments, with a QuickBooks integration. Essentials starts at $20 per user a month and is aimed at small, fast-growing teams. Advanced, for scaling mid-sized organizations, adds multi-currency expense management, a custom reporting center, project templates and custom invoice templates. Premier, for firms with international customers, adds multi-currency invoicing, custom cost and rate management, project budgeting and multi-level approvals. Advanced and Premier prices come through a demo.

Against Mavenlink, BigTime is the pick when the money side is what you used most: time entries flow to invoices without an export. Resourcing is the catch: BigTime Resource Management and BigTime Quotes are separate modules you add as you grow, so a firm that scheduled people in Mavenlink pays for a module on top of its plan. And only the entry price is public, so Advanced, Premier and the modules are still a sales conversation.

Standout features
  • Essentials starts at $20 per user a month
  • Time, invoicing, expenses and payments on all plans
  • QuickBooks integration
  • Resource Management and Quotes are add-on modules
+Pros
  • ✓Time-to-invoice without exports
  • ✓Payments and expenses in every plan
  • ✓Built for firms that bill hourly
−Cons
  • ✗Only Essentials has a public price
  • ✗Project budgeting waits until Premier
  • ✗Resource scheduling is an extra module
BigTime vs Mavenlink (Kantata)
CriterionBigTimeMavenlink (Kantata)
Published priceFrom $20/user/moNo, tailored quote
Invoicing and paymentsAll plansIncluded
Multi-currency invoicingPremierMulti-currency feature
Resource schedulingAdd-on moduleResource Management module
Verdict

Pick BigTime when billable hours and invoices are your daily work. Choose Productive if you also need modern budgeting and resourcing, or Runn alongside BigTime for capacity.

See BigTime plans →
6
Best quote-to-invoice suite

Scoro

3.7/5

Scoro is a work management and PSA suite that covers the cycle from quote to invoice: CRM and quotes, projects, time tracking, resource planning, billing and financial reporting. You build your plan from apps: combinations start from $17 per user a month (Time-billing: time tracking and invoicing), Projects & Resources and Quote to Cash cost $29, and End-to-end, with advanced work and financials, costs $57 per user a month. The minimum number of user seats for all combinations is 5, and annual billing takes 13 to 17% off. There is a free 14-day trial with no credit card required.

Watch the minimum: a 3-person consultancy still pays for 5 seats, so the cheapest combination costs at least $85 a month. Against Mavenlink, Scoro covers the same breadth, with CRM and quotes in its own apps and a price you can read. The price of breadth is setup: eight core apps and more than 35 add-ons and integrations, some charged per user, and free self-onboarding only for teams of up to 15 people; a larger team needs one of Scoro's onboarding packages.

Standout features
  • Combinations from $17 per user a month
  • Minimum 5 user seats on every combination
  • Quotes, projects, time and invoices in one suite
  • 14-day trial, no card
+Pros
  • ✓Quote-to-invoice in one system
  • ✓Build the plan from the apps you need
  • ✓Detailed financial and margin reports
−Cons
  • ✗5-seat minimum on every combination
  • ✗Many apps to configure before value
  • ✗Free self-onboarding only up to 15 people
Scoro vs Mavenlink (Kantata)
CriterionScoroMavenlink (Kantata)
Published priceFrom $17/user/moNo, tailored quote
Minimum seats5Set in the quote
Annual billing discount13 to 17%Set in the quote
Free trial14 daysDemo request
Verdict

Pick Scoro when you want one system from the first quote to the last invoice and can give setup a few weeks. Choose Productive for a faster start, or Teamwork.com if delivery matters more than finance.

See Scoro plans →
At a glance

6 Mavenlink alternatives compared

The six tools side by side, with the published price that Kantata does not give. Scores come from our comparison of ease of use, value, features, support and integrations; each score is the average of five sub-scores. Prices are those each pricing page shows, per user or per seat; most are billed yearly, and each yearly price says so.

Best forInstead of Kantata's tailored quoteFree planTeam sizeVisit
1ProductiveBest all-in-one Mavenlink replacementPublic per-user price, full PSA scope4.1/5$10/user/mo (Essential) billed yearly, $12 monthly, 3 seats min—Agencies 10-200Visit →
2RunnBest for resource and capacity planningPay per person scheduled, 30-day trial4.1/5$7 per resource seat/mo (Lite) billed yearly, $9 monthly, 20 seats min—Resource managersVisit →
3Teamwork.comBest for client work with a free plan to startFree plan for 5 users and 5 projects4.0/5$9.99/user/mo (Basics), billed yearly, 3 users min✓Client service teamsVisit →
4RocketlaneBest for client onboarding and implementation projectsClient portal, public price for 5+ seats3.9/5$49/team member/mo (Standard), billed yearly, minimum 5—SaaS services teamsVisit →
5BigTimeBest for time, billing and project accountingTime-to-invoice from $20 per user3.8/5From $20/user/mo (Essentials)—Hourly billing firmsVisit →
6ScoroBest quote-to-invoice suiteQuote-to-invoice from $17 per user3.7/5From $17/user/mo, minimum 5 users—Agencies and consultanciesVisit →

Is your tool missing from this page? Email us: hello@hackceleration.com

Buyer's guide

How to choose a Mavenlink alternative

Professional services automation (PSA) software runs the operations of a firm that sells time and expertise: agencies, consultancies, IT services and implementation teams. It joins four things that otherwise live in separate tools: projects and tasks, people and their capacity, time and expenses, and money (budgets, rates, invoices and margins). Mavenlink covered all four. Its alternatives come in three shapes. Full PSA suites such as Productive, Scoro and BigTime cover the four, with different strengths. Specialists such as Runn (resourcing) or Rocketlane (customer onboarding) do one part very well. Project management tools such as monday.com, Asana, Wrike or Smartsheet manage tasks well but leave rates, utilization and invoicing to other software. Before you compare, list which of the four you opened every week in Mavenlink. For neighbouring rankings, see our PSA software for consulting firms, our project management software for consulting firms and the resource planning software.

Know the unit you pay for

Most PSA tools bill per user a month, but the user is not always the same person. Runn bills per resource seat, the people you schedule, whether or not they log in. Rocketlane bills per team member and Scoro per user, both with a minimum of 5. A firm of 40 consultants with 6 managers pays very different bills depending on that unit.

Compare yearly with yearly

Most of these prices are billed yearly. Productive is $10 yearly or $12 monthly on Essential, Runn Lite $7 yearly or $9 monthly; Teamwork.com shows yearly prices and says yearly saves 29%. Put the same billing side by side, and ask Kantata for both when you get your quote.

Count the minimums before the price

Five of the six tools here publish a seat minimum. Runn starts at 20 resource seats, so $140 a month on Lite billed yearly. A 5-seat minimum turns a $49 seat into $245 a month at Rocketlane, and a $17 seat into $85 at Scoro. Productive and Teamwork.com Basics start at 3 seats ($30 a month on Productive Essential billed yearly), and Teamwork.com Accelerate at 5. For a team of 3, Productive or Teamwork.com cost less even when their per-seat price looks close.

Plan the migration

Export projects, time entries, rates and clients from Mavenlink before your contract ends, and decide which history you really need: moving open projects and recent time, and archiving the rest, keeps the import small. Rebuild rate cards and budget templates first; they drive every report afterwards.

Budget the onboarding, not just the seats

Setup is often billed apart from the licence. Rocketlane charges implementation packages on top of every plan; Scoro's free self-onboarding stops at 15 people, and larger teams need one of its onboarding packages; Teamwork.com sells onboarding and data migration as an add-on. Ask for this line in writing, next to the per-seat price, before you compare totals.

Check the accounting link

Invoices and time must reach your accounting software, and the plan decides it. BigTime includes its QuickBooks integration on every plan; Productive syncs with Xero, QuickBooks Online and four other accounting tools from Professional; Teamwork.com connects QuickBooks and Xero from Accelerate. Accelo, another PSA often compared with Kantata, sells on a custom quote like Kantata; OpenAir and Certinia target the same large firms as Kantata.
FAQ · 8 questions

Mavenlink alternatives: your questions

  • Will the new vendor migrate my Mavenlink data for me?
    Some will. Rocketlane says it has run more than 100 migrations, Mavenlink (Kantata) among them, typically completed within 30 days; Scoro's Professional and Premier onboarding packages, for teams of 26 to 49 people, include guided data migration; Teamwork.com sells onboarding and data migration as an add-on. Ask whether the migration is in the price: Rocketlane, for one, charges implementation on top of its plans.
  • When did Mavenlink become Kantata?
    In 2022, when Mavenlink and Kimble Applications announced the launch of Kantata, formed through their merger. At the time, the combined company said it had nearly 600 employees serving more than 2,000 clients and over half a million services professionals, which is why many long-time Mavenlink users only met the new name at their next renewal.
  • How do I log in to Mavenlink now?
    Through Kantata. Former Mavenlink accounts run on Kantata OX, and Kantata's site has a Login link in its top menu. If your bookmarked Mavenlink address no longer works, ask your administrator for your organization's Kantata OX sign-in link before assuming the account was closed.
  • Which companies use Kantata?
    Large services firms in software, consulting and IT services. Kantata publishes customer results such as 36% less cost leakage at Finastra, a 20% improvement in services revenue forecasting at Cornerstone and a 10% increase in resource utilization at Accedo: the profile of firms with hundreds of consultants, not of a 15-person agency.
  • Do I pay for clients and contractors in a PSA?
    Usually not for clients, usually yes for contractors. Productive does not charge for clients you invite into projects, but freelancers and contractors who work in it pay the same price as employees. Runn bills each resource in the planner, and a resource can be an employee, a contractor or even a material, while users who only log in are not resources. Count both groups before you compare quotes.
  • Can I use Asana or monday.com instead of Mavenlink?
    Only for the project part. Asana, monday.com and Wrike manage tasks, timelines and workloads well, but bill rates, utilization targets and invoicing are what a PSA adds on top. You then need a second tool for time and invoices: our project management software with time tracking comparison covers that pairing, which is why the full PSAs here rank first.
  • How long does it take to replace Mavenlink?
    From a few days for a small team to a few months for a complex one. Scoro, for example, says getting fully up and running takes from a few days up to a few weeks or months depending on the setup, data import included. Plan time to export projects and time entries, rebuild rate cards and budgets, connect accounting and train the team; a free trial or free plan, as Teamwork.com, Runn and Productive offer, lets you rebuild one live project before you move the rest.
  • Does Kantata work with Salesforce?
    Yes. Kantata offers a solution built on the Salesforce platform, which came from Kimble and is now Kantata SX, next to an open infrastructure for firms that do not run Salesforce. The six alternatives here run as their own apps; some connect to Salesforce, Teamwork.com on Optimize and Rocketlane on Premium, which is not the same as running inside it. That is the strongest reason for a Salesforce shop to stay.
Hack'celeration Lab

Get the next tool breakdown in your inbox

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.